Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • 1010WINS

    NYC bill would require gun stores to show graphic imagery conveying 'health dangers of firearm ownership'

    By Mack RosenbergAdam Warner,

    7 hours ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2NHE5I_0vTr6GKP00

    NEW YORK (1010 WINS) – A City Council member is unveiling first-in-the-nation legislation requiring gun stores to display graphic imagery that conveys the dangers of owning guns in the home.

    Council Member Erik Bottcher, of Manhattan, wants to drive home the message to help reduce gun violence, which is the leading cause of death of children in the U.S.

    “It’s proven that imagery associated with text is an effective way of communicating public health messages,” Bottcher said.

    He planned a news conference on the steps of City Hall on Thursday morning with activists from the gun control group March for Our Lives.

    A recent court ruling by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals paved the way for the legislation, which will be introduced Thursday .

    “The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that graphic images on cigarette packaging did not violate the First Amendment,” Bottcher said.

    The councilman wants to take that approach to cigarettes, which is already used on tobacco packaging in other countries, and apply it to guns.

    The legislation would require the 14 gun stores in New York City to have signage over the counter that includes graphic imagery along with accompanying safety warnings about the risks of homicide, suicide and unintentional injury.

    “The image could be of a child reaching for a gun in an unsecured drawer,” Bottcher said.

    He said it’s a public health approach to a public health crisis. The images would be designed by the city health department.

    “Every consumer who walks into a gun store, is considering buying a gun should know that firearm is exponentially more likely to hurt someone in their home,” Bottcher said.

    Expand All
    Comments / 5
    Add a Comment
    Hypocrisy abounds
    3h ago
    isn't that government forcing speech?was a similar case with abortion and the courts ruled it violated the free speech of the provider.
    BraveHearted Lion
    3h ago
    Okay, sure, I'll show what would colorfully happen to thieves and perps who want to violate my home or family 😎
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    The Shenandoah (PA) Sentinel6 days ago

    Comments / 0