Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • abc27 News

    Titan hearing continues following NTSB expert revealing issues found in sub implosion debris

    By Jameson Moyer,

    1 days ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3rpSM2_0vkRYmmH00

    NORTH CHARLESTON, S.C. (WCBD) — To begin the seventh day of a Coast Guard inquiry into why a submersible imploded, killing all five of its passengers, a National Transportation Safety Board chief engineer explained all the issues he found in the sub once he examined the debris.

    Dr. Don Kramer, chief of NTSB’s Materials Laboratory, presented the lab’s findings when examining the debris left from version 2 of the Titan’s hull. Some anomalies listed included waviness, wrinkles, porosity, voids in the hull structure, and rubbing damage.

    Dr. Kramer clarified that it is unclear whether these anomalies were present before the Titan imploded so far in the investigation.

    William Kohnen, with Hydrospace Inc., testified that his company created the first window for the Titan’s hull. However, the window cracked and was not in use when the sub imploded. Kohnen also drafted the Marine Technology Society letter of concern regarding the Titan’s development, addressed to the late OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush.

    This letter was never formally sent, but Rush ended up receiving one of the drafts; however, Kohnen does not know who gave it to him. Kohnen also used his time to give a brief overview of submersible history and make recommendations regarding certification and classification.

    Bart Kemper with Kemper Engineering presented reports and analysis on the Titan makeup.

    Thursday’s witnesses include Justin Jackson with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Mark Negley with Boeing, and John Winters, civilian master marine inspector with the Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound.

    Lieutenant Commander Jonathan Duffett with the Coast Guard Office of Vessel Compliance will close the day.

    LIVE UPDATES:

    4:12 p.m.

    Hearing adjourned for the day.

    2:30 p.m.

    NAVIQ GUIDANCE FOR CERTIFICATION OF PASSENGER CARRYING SUBMERSIBLES

    CG-086-NVIC-5-93-GUIDANCE-FOR-CERTIFICATION-OF-PASSENGER-CARRYING-SUBMERSIBLES_REDACTED Download

    2:23 p.m.

    On the Titan crew members were bolted in and could not escape the submersible from the inside.

    2:13 p.m.

    People who pay to go on a submersible are not a member of the crew and your not the owner then you are a passenger and the vessel is a small passenger vessel, according to Duffett.

    2:03 p.m. – 2:05 p.m.

    Small passenger vessels are required to be inspected and including submersible vessels carrying more than one person, according to US Code ready by Duffett.

    A passenger for hire is a passenger for who consideration is considered for carriage on the vessel, according to US Code read by Duffett.

    1:49 p.m.

    Duffett said some vessels are required to be inspected

    1:48 p.m.

    Duffett explains professional background.

    1:46 p.m.

    Jonathan Duffett swears oath.

    12:47 p.m.

    Adjourned for lunch.

    12:35 p.m.

    An ORV designation does not require the vessel to be classified.

    12:27 p.m.

    Being said a sub launched from a US flagged vessel does not have to do with a submersibles standards.

    12:08 p.m.

    Several Coast Guard zones have issued ORV letters for Antipodes.

    12:03 p.m.

    Both the Antipodes and Cyclops 1 were requested for Oceanographic Research Vessel (ORV) designation.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0RDPoe_0vkRYmmH00

    12:01 p.m.

    Two vessels had ORV letters that did not require vessel classification, Winters said. He said he did not know whether the Cyclops 1 was classed.

    11:59 a.m.

    Winters said Rush told him he wanted a submersible capable of taking passengers to the Titanic in 2010.

    He said the only passenger he knew on the Antipodes were scientists.

    11:57 a.m.

    OceanGate never request inspection or make Coast Guard notification of build of the Titan submersible, Winters said. He said OceanGate did not get any inspections or certification letters for the Titan with the Coast Guard.

    11:53 a.m.

    For oceanographic research purposes, only scientists can passenger on vessels.

    11:52 a.m.

    OceanGate demonstrated that Cyclops 1 would be used for scientific oceanographic research purposes to the Coast Guard, Winters said.

    11:49 a.m.

    Winters told Rush that he would not be able to get a small passenger vessel certificate. After this OceanGate pivoted to the ORV angle.

    11:47 a.m.

    Antipodes did not receive a small passenger vessel certificate, Winters said.

    11:43 a.m.

    Misile is how the Coast Guard documents activities on vessels it inspects, according to Winters.

    11:34 a.m.

    When inspecting the Antipodes while it was owned by OceanGate, Winters worked mainly with OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush. In one instance, Winters said he took the sub apart to inspect it and then put it back together.

    11:33 a.m.

    As a marine inspector they guide the vessel’s owner and operator through the inspection and safety process.

    The inspectors responsibility is to see if the vessel stands up to the design and plans sent to the Marine Safety Center

    11:31 a.m.

    The Marine Safety Center are technical advisers for the Coast Guard when is comes to inspecting vessels.

    11:29 a.m.

    Winters inspected the Antipodes which is the first submersible OceanGate bought.

    11:27 a.m.

    The owner/operator of a submersible has to apply for Coast Guard submersible inspection.

    11:26 a.m.

    The Coast Guard does not provide specific training for submersible inspectors, however Winters has inspected them before, he said. He learned through on the job training.

    11:20 a.m.

    US Code identifies what specific vessels are and how to inspect them. Marine inspectors are in charge of making sure the vessel in use is safely operated.

    11:17 a.m.

    Winters details professional and education background.

    11:15 a.m.

    John Winters master marine inspector with the Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound called to testify,

    10:55 a.m.

    Recess called until 11:15 a.m.

    Negley said he did not really know why the relationship between OceanGate and Boeing ended, but he thinks there services became too expensive for them.

    10:51 a.m. – 10:54 a.m.

    Boeing engineers recommend storing a carbon fiber cylindrical hull in a controlled area. Weather elements and temperature can affect the carbon fiber.

    1/3rd scaled models should be accounted for the same as full-scale models, according to Negley

    10:46 a.m.

    OceanGate and Boeing worked together in 2012 to 2013 and then they worked together in 2016.

    10:45 a.m.

    Boeing did not manufacture parts for OceanGate.

    10:43 a.m.

    OceanGate requested Boeing bring their commercially available acoustic emission system to test on one of their models, according to Negley, although he was not there for the testing.

    10:41 a.m.

    Negley says he has a general knowledge of acoustic emission sytems.

    10:38 a.m.

    Boeing does conduct carbon fiber residual destructive tests.

    10:37 a.m.

    Curing the part, the carbon fiber composite hull, creates residual stresses such as thermal stress, according to Negley.

    The way you cure the part creates different stresses.

    10:27 a.m.

    Boeing never saw a full design from OceanGate, Negley said.

    10:22 a.m.

    Boeing came up with an analysis that included a 7 inch hull they thought would be feasible for the hull. It was not super detailed and didn’t account for all aspects of the design.

    10:21 a.m.

    To Negley’s knowledge, Boeing has built a composite structure 12 inches thick but it was not the same size and structure as the carbon fiber hull OceanGate was wanting them to build.

    10:20 a.m.

    Boeing was asked to complete a preliminary feasibility study for OceanGate.

    10:19 a.m.

    Before working with OceanGate, Negley worked on a number of small composite pressure vessel hulls through Boeing, he said.

    10:18 a.m.

    Negley details educational and professional background.

    10:16 a.m.

    Mark Negley with Boeing called to testify.

    10:15 a.m.

    Hearing back in session.

    9:28 a.m.

    Recess called.

    9:24 a.m.

    NASA and OceanGate stayed in contact when test dives started on the Titan in 2021. The contact ended shortly after.

    The media releases involving NASA from OceanGate were approved by NASA. One got denied because it made it seem like NASA was endorsing OceanGate.

    9:11 a.m.

    NASA did not recommend carbon fiber curing for the hull.

    9:09 a.m.

    OceanGate was responsible for paying for all of NASA’s services, according to Jackson.

    9:07 a.m.

    OceanGate did talk plans for deep sea exploration at the beginning with NASA which included exploring shipwrecks. OceanGate did not make clear the pressure testing they were going to do on their hull.

    Due to COVID, the actual work was not performed NASA basically just consulted.

    9:06 a.m.

    If wrinkles are still in your parts post-fabrication you have to analyze there impact and effects, according to Jackson. It is not common practice to sand off wrinkles.

    9:04 a.m.

    NASA has been involved with building passenger carrying pressure vessels. The team recommended a heated debulk for keeping wrinkles out of the carbon fiber, according to Jackson.

    9:01 a.m.

    The designs of a spacecraft and submersibles should be treated differently. NASA was interested in other applications for materials than the submersible.

    9:00 a.m.

    A multi-curing process helps reduce wrinkles in the final design of carbon fiber.

    8:56 a.m. – 8:58 a.m.

    Jackson has manufactured pieces of carbon fiber up to 2 inches thick. A team of NASA engineers worked on carbon-fiber material testing with OceanGate. The team made recommendations for testing of thick carbon fiber pieces.

    8:54 a.m.

    OceanGate was supposed to pay over $148,000 for services but received only $40,000 and NASA returned close to $124,000.

    8:51 a.m.- 8:53 a.m.

    The purpose of the Reimbursable Space Act is to give companies access to NASA facilities so partnerships can work on mutually beneficial projects.

    There were 14 responsibilities for NASA on the agreement which was signed in the beginning of 2020.

    NASA provided remote consultation for the 1/3rd scale models but did not do any manufacturing, Jackson said.

    8:50 a.m.

    Jackson said the relationship with NASA and OceanGate began because they needed somewhere to build a composite cylinder.

    Bob Shuman OceanGate COO originally reached out.

    8:49 a.m.

    Jackson did not have submersible experience before working with OceanGate.

    8:48 a.m.

    Jackson details educational and professional background.

    8:45 a.m.

    Justin Jackson with NASA called to testify.

    8:33 a.m.

    Hearing to reconvene at 8:45 a.m.

    8:30 a.m.

    Hearing in session.

    Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to ABC27.

    Expand All
    Comments /
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment6 days ago

    Comments / 0