‘We Do Not Feel Safe’: Black Cornell Students Demand Termination of Faculty Member Who Said University Would Allow the KKK On Campus If They Wanted to, Sparking Outrage
By Christian Boone,
2 days ago
Cornell University ‘s Vice President of University Relations is under fire from a Black student alliance that says his unequivocal defense of free speech has endangered their safety.
Speaking to more than 200 Jewish parents of Cornell students via a videoconference on Sept. 30, Joel Malina was asked by the event’s moderator, Hillel Executive Director Rabbi Ari Weiss, if the university would allow a Ku Klux Klan member to appear on campus.
“If there were a faculty member that invited a KKK representative to speak or a student group that invited a KKK representative to speak, yes, we would allow that,” said Malina, who was meeting with the parents concerned about the university’s handling of pro-Palestinian protesters.
The hypothetical was consistent with a theme pushed by administrators throughout the meeting: As long as it doesn’t descend into targeted harassment, the university will not punish or prevent offensive speech, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.
One could argue that targeting Black people is what the KKK is all about. And Jewish students might say they felt targeted by the campus protests that some say became overtly anti-Semitic. This is why Cornell officials met with the Hillel group in the first place, to say: We hear you, we’ll protect you, but we’re not going to censor demonstrators.
But, as the KKK analogy shows, free speech can be an unwieldy concept. Cornell’s Black Student Alliance heard it and concluded, “All students of color at Cornell are under attack by administration. We do not feel safe, seen or heard.”
On Friday, about 180 students hit the streets demanding Malina’s dismissal. They also urged administrators to over turn the suspension of international graduate student Momodou Taal, bargain with Cornell Graduate Students United over Taal’s working conditions, limit police surveillance at protests, and revise the Interim Expressive Activity Policy, which spells out the university’s caveat-laden free speech doctrine.
Taal, from the United Kingdom, faces deportation after he was temporarily suspended for participating in a pro-Palestinian protest on Sept. 18 . University officials told Taal they were obligated to cancel his visa due to the suspension.
The policy gives Cornell officials some cover on recent controversies, including the reinstatement of history professor Russell Rickford, who celebrated Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack as “exhilarating” and “energizing.”
Rickford spent much of the past year on “voluntary leave” but returned to the classroom last month after the furor over his remarks died down.
Malina has not responded to the controversy over his statement.
“His suggestion has provoked fear, outrage and disbelief in a large number of the student and faculty body,” wrote Cornell junior Amira Jones in an op-ed published by the Daily Sun. “Such a statement demonstrates a profound disconnect from history and serves to undermine the very principles of free speech and assembly that, ironically, our university has made its goal for the academic year.”
Meanwhile, the search for meaning continues.
“The events of the last two days mean nothing could be the same,” one of the masked protest speakers said Friday. “I see my community mobilized the way I never could have imagined. Now we can’t go back.”
Freedom of speech means someone could say something you don't like!!! This wasn't a threat, it was an answer to a question!!! It isn't always about someone's feelings!!!!
Jeffery Grant
16h ago
Unbelievable, one of New York's premier educational institutions is not only anti-semetic but also racist. Let's stop funding this madness until they clean up their act.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.