We hope you’re having a fabulous summer, dear reader. We’ve got a new batch of federal court updates for you. So grab a chaise and a cool drink, and let’s gavel in.
Follow Ballotpedia on X or subscribe to the Daily Brew for the latest news and analysis.
We #SCOTUS and you can, too!
Grants
SCOTUS has accepted no new cases to its merits docket since our July 8 issue. To date, the court has agreed to hear 28 cases for the 2024-2025 term. The court has not yet scheduled the cases for argument.
Opinions
SCOTUS has not ruled on any cases since our July 8 edition. The court has issued rulings in 60 cases for the 2023-2024 term. Two cases were dismissed from the docket. There are no cases still awaiting rulings.
The Federal Vacancy Count
The Federal Vacancy Count tracks vacancies, nominations, and confirmations to all United States Article III federal courts in a one-month period. This month’s edition includes nominations, confirmations, and vacancies from July 2 to Aug. 1.
Highlights
Vacancies: There have been three new judicial vacancies since the July 8 report. There are 48 vacancies out of 870 active Article III judicial positions on courts covered in this report. Including the United States Court of Federal Claims and the United States territorial courts, 48 of 890 active federal judicial positions are vacant.
Nominations: There were seven new nominations since the August 2024 report.
Confirmations: There were four new confirmations since the August 2024 report.
Vacancy count for Aug. 1
A breakdown of the vacancies at each level can be found in the table below. For a more detailed look at the vacancies in the federal courts, click here.
*Though the United States territorial courts are named as district courts, they are not Article III courts. They are created in accordance with the power granted under Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. Click here for more information.
New vacancies
Three judges left active status since the previous vacancy count, creating Article III life-term judicial vacancies. The president nominates individuals to fill Article III judicial vacancies. Nominations are subject to U.S. Senate confirmation.
The president has announced 248 Article III judicial nominations since taking office Jan. 20, 2021. For more information on the president’s judicial nominees, click here.
New confirmations
As of Aug. 1, the Senate has confirmed 205 of President Biden’s Article III judicial nominees—159 district court judges, 43 appeals court judges, two international trade judges, and one Supreme Court justice—since his inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021.
Comparison of Article III judicial appointments over time by president (1981-Present)
Presidents have made an average of 182.3 judicial appointments through Aug. 1 of their fourth year in office.
President Joe Biden (D) made the most appointments through Aug. 1 of his fourth year with 205. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest with 148.
President Donald Trump (R) made the most appointments through four years with 234. President Ronald Reagan (R) made the fewest through four years with 166.
President Ronald Reagan (R) made the most appointments through one year in office with 41. President Barack Obama (D) made the fewest with 13.
Need a daily fix of judicial nomination, confirmation, and vacancy information? Click here for continuing updates on the status of all federal judicial nominees.
Or, keep an eye on this list for updates on federal judicial nominations.
Looking ahead
We’ll be back on Sept. 9 with a new edition of Robe & Gavel. Until then, gaveling out!
Contributions
Myj Saintyl compiled and edited this newsletter, with contributions from Sam Post and Ellie Mikus.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0