Here’s the NFL rule explanation behind why the Patriots had a pivotal touchdown called back
By Hayden Bird,
15 hours ago
A newly codified NFL rule was cited as the reason why Ja'Lynn Polk's would-be touchdown was called back.
With just over a minute remaining in Sunday’s Week 5 home game against the Dolphins, Patriots quarterback Jacoby Brissett appeared to have given his team a dramatic late lead after completing a 12-yard touchdown pass to rookie wide receiver Ja’Lynn Polk in the back of the endzone.
Yet the touchdown did not stand, called back by officials after it was recognized that — by the specific definition of NFL law — Polk’s foot had not completely come down in-bounds. The Patriots would up losing the game in the end, 15-10.
The exact definition relates to a new aspect of NFL rules in 2024. Article 7 in the rulebook, labeled “Player Possession” — dealing with the NFL definition of a catch — has a new “note” added to it this season.
“If any part of the foot hits out of bounds during the normal continuous motion of taking a step (heel-toe or toe-heel), then the foot is out of bounds. A player is inbounds if he drags his foot, or if there is a delay between the heel-toe or toe heel touching the ground.”
In practice, this means that had Polk “dragged” his toes as happens frequently with sideline catches, or had “toe-tapped,” it would have counted. Yet because his toe hit first in the midst of what officials judged was a “normal continuous motion of taking a step,” he was ruled to be out of bounds.
This has been a subject of discussion in the league for several years. Alex Barth of 98.5 The Sports Hub pointed out in the aftermath of Sunday’s controversy that there have been previous examples of the toe-touch interpretation of a catch in past years.
In 2024, as noted by the red text in the official league rulebook (indicating that it is new this season), the league “finally codified” the toe-touch rule, as NFL commentator Mike Florio noted prior to the start of the season.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0