Ukrainian forces crossed the border into Russia on August 6 in a highly risky move that diverged from its prior strategy in combating Russia's invasion.
It had taken and held 500 square miles of Russian territory as of last week, according to Ukraine's army chief.
Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, a former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, told the Kyiv Post that he viewed Ukraine's operation as a success.
He said the move would resonate beyond the territory itself, creating big problems for Russian President Vladimir Putin in how ordinary Russians see their leaders and military.
It showed how Ukraine can achieve such big wins without much Western involvement, he said.
He said the "incursion was taken without a lot of guidance from the West, and look how well it worked."
A local volunteer looks at a building damaged by Ukrainian strikes in Kursk on August 16, 2024, following Ukraine's offensive into Russia's western Kursk region.
Breedlove, who is also a retired US Air Force general, compared Ukraine's success in Kursk to its big counteroffensive last year, where Ukraine was unable to take back vast swathes of territory.
He said that with that counteroffensive, "I think the West and others put a lot of limits on Ukraine."
He said be believed Ukraine would have been more successful if it could have been as daring as it was in Kursk.
"I believe if Ukraine had been able to use that kind of initiative last year, we would have had a different result."
Western limits
While Western countries have committed billions of dollars of weaponry to Ukraine, they also place limits on their use, which have proved frustrating.
Breedlove said that he believes Western policymakers have limited Ukraine because Putin has convinced them that if Ukraine wins, "there will be immense consequences."
Destroyed Russian tanks lie on a roadside near Sudzha, in the Kursk region, on August 16.
AP Photo
"The most successful weapon that Putin has in this war is intimidation or, in military parlance, his ability to restrict Western actions by his threats."
Breedlove said "I believe this war will end exactly how Western policymakers want it to end. Right now, Western policymakers are unable to morally or intellectually understand what a Ukrainian win would mean. Putin defeated, Russia's military defeated."
He said Western limits on Ukraine should change: "If Ukraine is able to strike Russian equipment supply and personnel before they get to Ukraine, I think Ukraine can win this war."
Breedlove said he believes it is too early to say for sure if Kursk is "a great strategic success," though he believes it is.
He said that in this incursion, Ukraine has "dictated the terms of this fight," a stark contrast to much of the war, when its focus was on limiting Russia.
George Barros, a Russia analyst at the Institute for the Study of War think tank, told BI last month that it's not clear how the fast-moving operation will end, but he said it has been positive for Ukraine after months of grinding war, during which it was almost entirely on the defensive.
"It is now no longer the Ukrainians lying on their back for nine-plus months at a time simply trying their best to triage," he said.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0