Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Business Insider

    Iran's ballistic missiles have questionable accuracy, but Russia may not care

    By Paul Iddon,

    2 days ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2icIn3_0vWJ7lWs00

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0v1W5P_0vWJ7lWs00
    Russia is adding Iranian ballistic missiles to its arsenal against Ukraine, but claims about their accuracy are dubious.
    • Russia is getting more missiles from Iran, but claims about their accuracy may be way off.
    • A recent Iranian attack highlighted what are likely to be deep flaws with ballistic missiles.
    • Missile accuracy may not be high on Russia's priority list.

    Russia is restocking its ballistic missile arsenal with help from Iran, but there's good reason to believe that these 200 or so short-range missiles Iran is widely believed to have delivered are not nearly as accurate as Tehran claims.

    Iran recently transferred Fath-360 close-range ballistic missiles to Russia, weapons that can blast fortified positions or cities near the frontlines and which could strain Ukraine's air defenses. Iran claims the Fath-360 is accurate to about 100 feet of a target, but a recent Iranian attack highlighted deep flaws with its missile claims.

    "Russia needs all the shorter range firepower that it can get, and despite the technical failings of Iranian missiles, the Russian war in Ukraine is not about precision, it is about brute force," Nicholas Heras, senior director of strategy and innovation at the New Lines Institute, told BI.

    Reports of the Fath-360 delivery via the Caspian Sea came barely a week after the Associated Press reviewed a new expert report on Iran's April missile attack on Israel that raised serious questions about the accuracy of Iranian missiles. The report found that the liquid-fueled Emad missiles that Iran fired at an Israeli F-35I air base missed by a wide margin. Iran claimed the Emad could hit within 50 meters of a target, but the experts concluded the weapons had a 0.75-mile circular error probable, a measure of the distance from the aim-point in which 50% of missiles will land. That's 40 times less accurate than Iran claimed.

    "Russia wants this missile system in order to reduce stress on its own stocks of mobile short-range ballistic missiles, most notably for systems such as Iskander," Matthew Orr, Eurasia Analyst at the risk intelligence company RANE, told Business Insider.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1MeVkU_0vWJ7lWs00
    An Israeli soldier examines part of an Iranian ballistic missile fired at Israel during Iran's direct attack in April.

    These latest reports follow a Reuters exclusive in early August that Russian military personnel were receiving training in Iran on the Fath-360.

    While the Emad, derived from the Shahab-3 family of Iranian missiles, is from a different class than the Fath-360, such accuracy issues could tarnish the usefulness of Moscow's newest imports. Russia already acquired KN-23 ballistic missiles from North Korea . However, their use against Ukraine early this year raised serious questions about their accuracy.

    On the other hand, the short range of the Fath-360 (75 miles) may indicate that Russia simply wants these missiles to augment its firepower in its depleting war of attrition against Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine.

    "Russia is likely not concerned with the wide target deviation circular error because many of Russia's own munitions have similar issues and because Russia has targets for which it is less concerned with such deviation," RANE's Orr said.

    "The short range of this system suggests that Russia likely intends to use these systems against Ukrainian front-line forces and their supporting infrastructure, pushing the system launchers into greater danger than some of its own launchers for longer-range systems," he added.

    "Thus, they will supplement Russia's glide bomb campaign and further complicate the work of Ukrainian anti-air forces near the front line."

    Consequently, while these close-range ballistic missiles could contribute to some Russian tactical victories, they are certainly no game-changers.

    "It seems dubious that several hundred of these munitions could have a significant impact on the war," Orr said.

    The Iranian missiles are further justification for why Ukraine needs relaxed rules on its use of ATACMS missiles and other strike weapons like the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile , a cruise missile launched from an aircraft, Orr said.

    That step, Orr concluded, "could have a significant impact on the war by increasing the costs of the war for Russia."

    Heras from the New Lines Institute similarly believes that Russia isn't overly picky about its imports.

    "The Russians want to overwhelm and bludgeon Ukrainian forces, which are already facing manpower shortfalls ," Heras said. "It is not the type of missile that Iran is giving to Russia that matters, it is the deepening of the Iranian-Russian military alliance that is the big story here."

    "The Russian war in Ukraine advances Iran's goal to build a great power alliance with Russia."

    Read the original article on Business Insider
    Expand All
    Comments / 50
    Add a Comment
    Don T. Spamme
    2h ago
    Russia doesn't care, as long as it kills people in Ukraine.
    Mike Parsons
    1d ago
    JUST LIKE ALL THE CRAPPY ARTILLERY , THAT NORTH KOREA SENT TO HELP RUSSIA, LIKE A MILLION PIECES, WHERE HALF WERE COMPLETE DUDS, LOLIRAN ISN'T MUCH BETTER, HAHA, THEY JUST DON'T USE THE BEST MATERIALS, THEIR DESIGNS AREN'T NEAR AS GOOD AS OURS, & THEIR RANGE SUCK, & NOW, WE'LL ALL SEE, IF THEY'RE ACCURATE OR NOT
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News

    Comments / 0