Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • CalMatters

    California Legislature is back to decide 1,300 bills

    By Lynn La,

    2024-08-05

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1tGHnU_0unzAGtb00

    Stay up-to-date with free briefings on topics that matter to all Californians. Subscribe to CalMatters today for nonprofit news in your inbox.

    The California Legislature gets back to work today, starting a one-month sprint to adjournment on Aug. 31.

    Lawmakers have a lot to finish up: More than 1,300 bills are still in play, though many will not reach Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk. One high-profile measure is Assembly Bill 1825 , which would prohibit library review committees . As CalMatters Capitol reporter Alexei Koseff explains, the bill would require California public libraries to detail their policies for choosing books, including a plan to allow residents to voice their objections, but libraries cannot ban material because it deals with race or sexuality.

    The measure comes amid a culture war that includes parental rights groups who want to limit access to gender-identity content and other materials. They’re facing off against LGBTQ advocates who say it’s important to have library books about marginalized groups available to the public.

    A handful of local officials have already attempted to establish book review committees, such as Fresno County.

    A Newsom spokesperson would not comment on pending legislation. But last year, the governor signed a law to prevent school boards from banning books based solely on the books’ inclusion of the history or culture of LGBTQ people and other underrepresented ethnic, cultural and religious groups.

    Learn more about the bill to ban book review committees in Alexei’s story.

    Another contentious bill is AB 3027 , which would create a training program for law enforcement to identify and address “transnational repression,” writes CalMatters news intern Shaanth Nanguneri . The FBI defines this type of violence as foreign governments reaching into the U.S. to intimidate or harm dissidents or expatriates.

    Authored by Assemblymember Jasmeet Bains , a Bakersfield Democrat and California’s only Sikh state lawmaker, the bill is in response to a June 2023 killing of a Sikh activist in Canada . The measure lists Russia, China, Iran and India as governments that “increasingly rely” on transnational repression to control dissidents abroad. Law enforcement agencies, including the California State Sheriff’s Association, support the bill.

    But some leading conservative Hindu activists are pushing back against the measure. They want to strike India from the bill language, arguing that the bill risks overlooking violence committed by Sikh separatists.

    The proposal draws the same battle lines of a bill last year to ban caste discrimination that Newsom vetoed, calling it “ unnecessary .” Though it’s unclear how the governor will vote on Bains’ bill if it reaches his desk, an Indian American political donor who initially took credit for Newsom’s vetoing of the caste bill met with Newsom in early July.

    Read more about the transnational repression bill in Shaanth’s story.

    Other bills under consideration:

    • AB 2918 : The Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California and other supporters are expected to rally at the state Capitol today in support of a bill to expand disclosure requirements for school districts when implementing ethnic studies courses.
    • AB 2316 : Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel , an Encino Democrat, plans to drum up support for his bill to ban six food dyes from food in California public schools at an online press conference Tuesday.

    CalMatters covers the Capitol: We have guides and stories to keep track of bills and your lawmakers , find out how well legislators are representing you , explore the Legislature’s record diversity and make your voice heard .


    CalMatters kudos: Our Byrhonda Lyons is a finalist in the Institute for Nonprofit News contest for investigative reporting for her stories on shortcomings in California’s parole system . The winner will be announced Sept. 18.



    Debate is on between Schiff, Garvey

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2VKCC7_0unzAGtb00
    Rep. Adam Schiff, third from left, listens to Republican Steve Garvey, second from left, answer a question during a televised debate at KRON4 studio in San Francisco on Feb. 12, 2024. Photo courtesy of NewsNation

    California voters will get to see the two main U.S. Senate candidates face off in a televised debate before the November election.

    Late Friday, Rep. Adam Schiff, the Burbank Democrat who is way ahead in the polls , announced that he’s agreed to a debate hosted by ABC7 Los Angeles and the League of Women Voters California.

    Republican Steve Garvey agreed to that one earlier last week. No date has been announced, and there’s no word on the second debate that Garvey wanted. Garvey and Schiff debated three times before the March 5 primary, along with Democratic Reps. Barbara Lee and Katie Porter.

    • Schiff , in a statement: “This fourth debate will be another chance for Californians to hear about my vision for our state, and my plans to tackle our toughest challenges. From lowering the cost of housing, gas and food, to expanding access to quality childcare and healthcare, to protecting our rights and democracy — the difference in this race could not be more stark.”

    For more on where Garvey and Schiff stand on the issues, check out the CalMatters Voter Guide .

    On one key issue — immigration — Garvey isn’t toeing the party line.

    The former L.A. Dodgers star dodged the Republican National Convention last month, and now he’s distancing himself from the GOP policy platform that calls for the mass deportation of undocumented immigrants , as directed by former President Donald Trump.

    • Garvey , in a commentary published Friday in La Opinión : “Illegal immigration is also blatantly unfair to the millions of hard-working immigrants who came to the United States legally and now call California home. However, the mass deportation of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in our country is not a realistic solution. Fixing the immigration issue is more complex.”

    Instead, Garvey said he would take a “comprehensive approach” to immigration — beefing up security at the U.S.-Mexico border, then accelerating family-based green card applications and more.

    Garvey — who is trying to win over Latinos , Democrats and independents in a state where no Republican has won statewide since 2006 — only recently confirmed that he voted for Trump in March and plans to do so again in the November election .

    November election: It’s not too early to get informed. Keep up with CalMatters coverage by signing up for 2024 election emails. Check out our Voter Guide , including updates and videos on the 10 propositions and a FAQ on how to vote . And read up on the history of ballot measures in California.

    Is Chevron ‘leaving’ CA? Not really

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4Symyh_0unzAGtb00
    The Chevron Oil Refinery in Point Richmond on July 19, 2019. Photo by Anne Wernikoff, CalMatters

    On Friday, oil and gas company Chevron said it will relocate its California headquarters from San Ramon to Houston — a move that set off political flares among both parties.

    But Chevron’s relocation is going to most immediately impact its CEO and vice chairman , who will both move to Texas before the end of the year. Of the 2,000 employees who work in the San Ramon headquarters (compared to 7,000 Chevron employees already working in the Houston area), only those with “corporate functions” will move to Houston over the next five years.

    No California manufacturing, production or other oil operations Chevron jobs are heading to Texas as of yet, and the company will still have a large presence in the state where it was founded more than a century ago. Chevron will continue to operate its two massive oil refineries in Richmond and El Segundo (where the company says it employs about 4,600 workers and contractors), its oil fields in Kern County and its 1,800 gas stations across the state.

    Still, this didn’t stop some Republicans from seizing the news as yet another example of the state’s environmental and business overregulation. Especially since the announcement comes on the heels of tech billionaire Elon Musk’s threat to relocate the headquarters of X and SpaceX from California to Texas.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called it a “ snub to California .” California Assembly Republicans specifically called out Gov. Newsom for his “ failed policies ,” which contrast Republicans’ support of “cutting excessive taxes and regulations to grow the economy and create jobs.” And the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board said: “ Democrats in Sacramento want to put (Chevron) out of business .”

    Meanwhile, following the announcement, Newsom posted — then quickly removed — a video touting legislation he pushed last year to investigate alleged price gouging from oil companies , reports Politico . Newsom spokesperson Alex Stack also said that the relocation “is the logical culmination of a long process that has repeatedly been foreshadowed by Chevron,” and that California is “the leading creator of clean energy jobs.”

    And lastly: EV chargers

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0tYTFn_0unzAGtb00
    Vehicles charging at the Tesla Supercharger lot in Kettleman City on June 23, 2024. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local

    Under California’s ambitious goal to completely transition to electric cars by 2035, the state will have to build public charging stations at an unprecedented pace . CalMatters climate reporter Alejandro Lazo and producer Robert Meeks have a video segment on Alejandro’s story about this issue as part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it here .

    SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal .


    California Voices

    The tech industry’s argument that a bill to regulate artificial intelligence will drive out innovation from California is misleading, hollow and dangerous, writes Sunny Gandhi , vice president of political affairs at Encode Justice.


    Other things worth your time:

    Some stories may require a subscription to read.


    Newsom assigns military, state prosecutors to Alameda County cases // East Bay Times

    Kern County supervisor resigns amid criminal probe // Los Angeles Times

    Alex Garcia resigns as Wasco mayor, denies allegations // Bakersfield Now

    OC demands refund of millions supervisor awarded to daughter’s group // LAist

    Park Fire: Critical weather ahead with triple-digit temperatures, dry winds // San Francisco Chronicle

    Gas prices down in CA over last three months // The Mercury News

    AI software seeps into college applications , admissions // San Francisco Chronicle

    Cal State board anticipates a ‘painful year’ as campuses cut costs // EdSource

    Wild horses romp all over massive CA dam-removal project // San Francisco Chronicle

    Feds commit $5.1B to South Bay BART Extension // KQED

    Expand All
    Comments / 14
    Add a Comment
    Sancho Verde
    08-05
    If we sent them home, with pay, it would still be cheaper than if they were in session.
    Texas_Dually_Tim
    08-05
    This is out of control. Do any of these new bills actually help anyone.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt11 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt12 days ago

    Comments / 0