Open in App
  • Local
  • Headlines
  • Election
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Carl Belen

    Lawsuit Filed as Gummy Candy Leaves Toddler Quadriplegic

    2024-01-07
    • Amelie Paredes Sotelo, a three-year-old toddler from California, suffered extensive permanent brain damage and spastic quadriplegia after choking on a gummy candy.
    • The family is suing Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co., alleging the candy was excessively sticky and lacked proper warnings.
    • The incident has dramatically changed the family's life, with Amelie's mother quitting her job to become a full-time caregiver.

    In a tragic incident, Amelie Paredes Sotelo, a three-year-old girl from California, became quadriplegic and will require a feeding tube for the rest of her life following a choking incident.

    The toddler consumed a Candy Land Gummy Dot in December, which led to this catastrophic outcome. The gummy candy, alleged to be 'excessively sticky,' became lodged in her throat, causing a blockage in her airway. Despite being rushed to the emergency room, medical professionals struggled to dislodge the candy. Due to the prolonged oxygen deprivation, Amelie suffered extensive brain damage and spastic quadriplegia.

    This life-altering incident prompted the family to file a lawsuit against the manufacturer, Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co. The family's legal counsel criticized the product's design, citing its extreme stickiness and the absence of a choking hazard warning on the packaging. According to the lawsuit, the gummy candy turned into a 'glue-like substance' in the mouth, adhering to the tissue and making it difficult to remove.

    The aftermath of the incident has significantly impacted the family. Amelie's mother, Maria Aylin Sotelo Camacho, had to leave her job to care for her daughter full-time. The family's attorney emphasized the need for adequate warnings on such products to prevent similar tragedies. The lawsuit seeks $50,000 in compensation and punitive damages, with a jury trial requested.

    SOURCE


    Expand All
    Comments / 24
    Add a Comment
    my2cents
    01-07
    It’s a fucking choking hazard like hotdogs, marshmallows and grapes and anything else that blocks an airway. Parents shouldn’t have given a choking hazard to their child.
    Car La
    01-07
    Very sad for the family. Their child is a living corpse. I don’t see how it’s the fault of the company unless they left out a warning for possible choking hazard on the package. If no warning then the family found that loophole. The word “ gummy” describes the texture of the product. Parents are 100% responsible for giving a toddler a small ( choke sized gummy candy) . Now they are left with a shell of what use to be their kid.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    The Current GA2 days ago
    The Shenandoah (PA) Sentinel17 hours ago

    Comments / 0