Open in App
  • Local
  • Headlines
  • Election
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • CBS Pittsburgh

    Supreme Court tosses decision letting 18-year-olds carry guns during PA emergencies

    By CBS Pittsburgh,

    1 days ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1XkXD2_0w7ygC6500

    Gritty stuns in new calendar from Philadelphia Flyers | Digital Brief 02:27

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday tossed out a decision allowing 18-year-olds to openly carry guns during emergencies in Pennsylvania.

    There were no noted dissents in the high court's brief order. It lets stand a ban on people aged 18 to 20 carrying guns in public during a declared state of emergency.

    The case comes amid major shifts in the firearm legal landscape following an influential Supreme Court decision in 2022 that expanded gun rights. The high court said any firearm restrictions must have a strong basis in history.

    Multiple gun laws have been struck down in the wake of that ruling, including age restrictions, by judges in states like Minnesota, Virginia and Texas. The Pennsylvania challengers argued that younger people weren't barred from carrying guns at the time of the nation's founding, so they shouldn't be barred today.

    But the Supreme Court handed down a new opinion this year that upheld a law intended to protect victims of domestic violence. The high court said Tuesday the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals should reconsider the Pennsylvania case in light of that decision.

    Pennsylvania officials, for their part, had argued that there is a long tradition of limiting guns to people 21 and older dating back to the 1850s.

    Comments / 59
    Add a Comment
    Truth Speaker
    5m ago
    They want more Kyle Rittenhouse vigilantes types. You wouldn't think the highest court in the land would be the most corrupt, but it is.
    Havoc
    21m ago
    Could still be returned if the lower court applies the domestic violence criteria and it doesn’t apply. If we’re going to go down the route of “which tradition applies Bruen or 1850”? It’s a fucking joke. Sometimes I think scotus is worried about job security rather than the actual law.
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News

    Comments / 0