Sign up for The Brief , The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ’s latest lawsuit against an immigrants’ rights organization claims the Houston group violated federal rules that govern nonprofits’ political involvement by criticizing former President Donald Trump, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and a new state immigration law .
Paxton sued FIEL — a Spanish acronym for Familias Inmigrantes y Estudiantes en la Lucha, which translates to Immigrant Families and Students in the Fight — a month ago in the 127th Harris County District Court and asked a judge to dissolve the organization. The immigrant-run group, founded in 2007, offers education, social and legal services to immigrant families in the region.
However the state’s lawsuit against FIEL appears to be the first to target a group far from the border and the first to target what is essentially political speech.
“It comes to us as a surprise that suddenly we are being targeted by the Attorney General of Texas in an attempt to take away what has been a beacon of hope for thousands of Houstonians for the last 17 years,” FIEL Executive Director Cesar Espinosa said in a statement Friday. “From disaster relief to higher education to letting people know about their rights, FIEL has been there in the search for equity and fairness for all Texans.”
Texas alleged in court filings that FIEL “openly flouts” rules that say nonprofits can’t participate in political campaigns or engage in “carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempt to influence legislation.”
The initial lawsuit uses as evidence FIEL’s social media posts encouraging people to vote against Trump’s immigration proposals; the group’s advocacy during past state legislative sessions including against a 2023 law, Senate Bill 4 , that would let Texas police arrest people suspected of having entered the country illegally; its support — and occasional disavowment — of President Joe Biden’s immigration policies; and social media comments criticizing Abbott.
The state asked Judge Ravi K. Sandill to issue a temporary injunction stopping FIEL’s current operations. After the court considers the merits of the suit, the state asked for a revocation and termination of FIEL’s corporate registration and certificate of formation, dissolution of its existence and a permanent injunction stopping the group from doing business again in Texas .
”The state embraces the First Amendment’s value that Americans generally should have their voices heard on all types of political matters and campaign vigorously in support of one candidate or another,” the filing states. “But it has long been the law that entities cannot enjoy (nonprofit) status while doing so.”
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund lawyers representing FIEL argued in court filings that the request for a temporary injunction should be dismissed because some of the state’s claims are years old, showing a lack of urgency.
In more detailed filings, FIEL’s lawyers argued that Paxton is not entitled to what he seeks and suggested that Paxton was retaliating against FIEL because it is a plaintiff in two federal lawsuits challenging the state’s election laws. One of the suits names Paxton as a defendant.
The lawyers said that it’s just the most recent instance of Paxton misusing a state statute to try shutting down an organization that aids migrants — as he tried in El Paso, where he filed a lawsuit aimed at shutting down a decades-old a migrant shelter network.
In one filing, the lawyers included screenshots of other FIEL social media posts showing the group explaining new laws at the Mexican consul in Houston, a flier for an immigration forum and an infographic about information that might be helpful for undocumented persons after a tornado struck Pasadena.
“The fact that Paxton, who has targeted others with whom he disagrees, is using the power of his public office specifically to target a non-profit organization because of FIEL’s exercise of its First Amendment rights to free speech and to seek redress in the courts is reprehensible and unconstitutional,” the lawyers wrote.
The attorney general’s office did not return an email seeking comment Friday.
In February, Paxton’s office asked Annunciation House in El Paso for records related to the nonprofit’s work with immigrants, alleging it operated as a stash house. A judge last month dismissed a related lawsuit filed by the state, but Texas has since appealed the dismissal.
In the Rio Grande Valley, one of the largest migrant aid groups in the state, Catholic Charities, received a similar request from Paxton’s office. A Hidalgo County judge last month ruled that Paxton could not depose the leader of the McAllen shelter, which helps migrants by temporarily providing food, shelter and other basic necessities.
"The attorney general's latest attack on an immigrants' rights organization follows a familiar formula of loudly publicized harassment and targeted misinformation to create fear and confusion,” said David Donatti, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas. “Once again, he wishes to eliminate efforts to educate immigrants, their families, and our communities about our constitutional rights. His track record in court is dismal, and we hope and expect that his losing streak will continue."
The full program is now LIVE for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival , happening Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Explore the program featuring more than 100 unforgettable conversations on topics covering education, the economy, Texas and national politics, criminal justice, the border, the 2024 elections and so much more. See the full program.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
COPYRIGHT 2024 BY CROSSROADS TODAY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS MATERIAL MAY NOT BE PUBLISHED, BROADCAST, REWRITTEN OR REDISTRIBUTED.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0