Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Cycling Weekly
'Plague of mosquitoes': The best and most concerning quotes from Parliament's cycling debate
By Tom Davidson,
19 hours ago
You probably missed it, but yesterday lunchtime, the UK's House of Lords met to debate cycling safety.
It wasn't so much the safety of cyclists they were discussing, around 100 of whom are killed on UK roads every year, but more the havoc cyclists are said to wreak themselves. From red light jumping, to speeding and mobile phone pinching, a rather sketchy impression was painted. Anyone playing anti-cyclist bingo would have quickly seen their card fill up.
The point of the debate, of course, was to come up with solutions for stopping lawless cyclists. You've almost certainly heard them all before. Some of the Lords proposed licences, bike registration and even obligatory high-vis jackets. Others warned that overregulation may (see: will) lead to fewer people riding bikes.
Without wanting to trivialise the debate – I, for one, believe that all road users not only owe, but should prioritise a duty of care to each other, whether they're behind a steering wheel, holding handlebars, or simply walking on the pavement – here are some of the best, and most nonsensical, quotes from the afternoon.
A bit of context before this next one: Lord Hogan-Howe was the person who secured and kicked off the debate. Below, he suggests that cyclists should be tried under laws that predate the invention of the modern bicycle.
There was, of course, some balance to the debate. The following quotes show a particular solidarity towards cyclists.
The first comes in response to Lord Hogan-Howe's remark that "for fit people, through muscle power, 30 miles an hour is easily attainable on the flat".
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0