In juvenile dependency cases, parents are entitled to certain due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. These rights include: 1. Notice of the Proceedings: Parents must be given notice that is reasonably calculated to apprise them of the dependency proceedings and afford them an opportunity to object.

I want to start by pointing out that corruption lies within the individuals who commit the wrongful acts and do so intentionally. It would be completely unfair to say that any entire organisation is corrupt. There are many individuals within these agency's who are innocent and do not fall into the category of corruption. Children's Services does have case workers who work in the field because they genuinely care about children. There are many helpless children all over the world who are in need of being protected. For those individuals the role of a caseworker is nothing short of a challenge, but I commend them for their commitment in doing good for others.

Here's a look at why we need new Commissioners and why it's important to vote for those running!. The Adams County Ohio Commissioners are responsible for the general administration of the county, including controlling county purchasing, and setting the budget and appropriating authority for county government. commissioners - Adams County Government.

Calvin Eli Robinson, a resident of Peebles, Ohio, and a member of the Republican Party, is running for Commissioner in Adams County. Robinson is committed to empowering the community and upholding the principles of a Constitutional Republic. As an ironworker, Robinson brings a unique perspective to the political arena, reflecting the values and work ethic of the local community.

Due process is a constitutional requirement that ensures the government respects all the legal rights owed to a person according to the law. It applies when the government acts in a way that could deny a citizen of life, liberty, or property interests. The concept of due process is enshrined in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution[1][6]. Due process can be divided into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process[7][9].

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides protection against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It safeguards individuals' right to privacy and establishes important principles:

In terms of missing children in foster care, a report from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General, found that only one-third of the thousands of children who go missing from foster care each year are reported to a national agency as required by federal law. https://imprintnews.org/news-briefs/audit-finds-child-welfare-agencies-often-dont-report-missing-kids-to-national-office/240095.

In Adams County, Ohio ex parte communications occur before each hearing from my experience. This upsets me greatly being that these communications are a violation of an individuals due process rights, yet it occurs each hearing. On November 01, 2023 a hearing was held in the common pleas court. I expected the ex parte communications to occur. The part that upsets me greatly is, from the hallway my significant other and myself had to listen to the Magistrate, CPS, the prosecutor, and our lawyers all sit in the court laughing hysterically. Laughing while discussing our case prior to allowing us to enter the courtroom. November 13, 2023 we sat in the hall for about an hour and a half. when my attorney arrived everyone except for us entered the courtroom, while we waited in the hallway. Our lawyers came out into the hallway talked with us a bit and went back in, again while we waited in the hallway. What are they discussing prior to allowing us in the room????? The audio is not turned on until we enter so proving this may be challenging but I have a few ideas...

Willful blindness, also known as conscious avoidance or deliberate ignorance, is a legal concept that expands the definition of knowledge to include situations where a person intentionally keeps themselves unaware of facts that would render them liable or implicated. This doctrine is often employed in federal criminal prosecutions, where courts expand a statutory “knowledge” or “willfulness” requirement to encompass “willful blindness” or “deliberate indifference” [1][2].

A corrupt juvenile court can violate due process in several ways. Firstly, if judges or court officials are biased or influenced by external factors, they may not ensure fair treatment for the juveniles involved. This can lead to a violation of their right to a fair trial. Secondly, if procedures within the court are not followed correctly or if evidence is mishandled or tampered with, it can undermine the protection of legal rights for the juveniles. Thirdly, if the accused juveniles are not given adequate representation, either by a qualified attorney or by not being provided with the necessary resources to defend their case, their right to legal representation is violated. Finally, if the court does not allow the juveniles to confront their accusers or question witnesses, it limits their ability to challenge the accusations against them, thereby violating their right to confront their accusers. These actions by a corrupt juvenile court erode the principles of due process and can have severe consequences for the juveniles involved. A corrupt juvenile court can have far-reaching implications, compromising the very essence of due process and gravely impacting the lives of the juveniles involved. The violation of their right to a fair trial, as a result of biased judges or court officials influenced by external factors, raises concerns about the impartiality of the proceedings. When the individuals responsible for ensuring justice become swayed by personal interests, the foundation of fairness crumbles, leaving the accused juveniles vulnerable and deprived of their fundamental rights.

When discussing drug screens in the context of Child Protective Services (CPS), it is important to consider that drug screens are considered a search under the Fourth Amendment. This means that CPS must follow legal requirements when conducting drug screens to ensure that they do not violate the constitutional rights of individuals involved.

When individuals are unaware of their rights, it can lead to situations where those in power may disregard those rights, particularly in communities with lower levels of education. In this article, I am including real case documents to bring awareness to the severity of the situation, hoping to motivate individuals to protect their rights and seek justice when necessary. Additionally, it highlights potential constitutional violations under the U.S. Codes. One of the most pressing concerns in many communities revolves around the juvenile court and children's services agencies. It's essential to challenge stereotypes and encourage empathy for those facing these challenges. When we vote to appoint a person as a judge, we expect them to conduct their duties with integrity. We are all human prone to errors, even judges and lawyers have been known to struggle with drug addiction or alcoholism. Judges bear the responsibility of acting with integrity, making judgments based solely on the law, and maintaining impartiality. For those dealing with Child Protective Services (CPS) cases, understanding the legal framework can be crucial: In the provided links you will see documents from a case in which children were removed from their home and in my opinion this was done wrongfully. This particular Individual was at a local gas station, buying bug juices for the eight children in her home. she passed out due to her sugar dropping just after paying for the juices. Someone made a phone call about the parent. The parent was arrested while unconscious and unresponsive, raising questions about due process and the circumstances of the arrest. https://imgur.com/a/RxXQBOK This could potentially violate the Fourth Amendment ([18 U.S. Code § 242] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242 and the Fourteenth Amendment.

The rise in misconduct among children's services social workers is becoming increasingly alarming, posing a significant threat to families. The lack of accountability within the department is a troubling issue that needs attention.

Wiretapping, the process of intercepting telephone conversations or electronic communications, has become a critical tool of law enforcement and has been used for decades to assist in gathering evidence. However, when it comes to dependency cases, the use of wiretapping raises concerns about privacy and accountability.

Holding Child Protective Services (CPS) accountable for lying under oath is a challenging endeavor, but it's crucial to ensure the integrity of the child welfare system. When faced with this situation, there are several steps an individual can take to seek accountability:

When dealing with Child Protective Services (CPS) visits, it is important to understand your rights under the Fourth Amendment. Here are some key points to keep in mind:. 1. **Consent**: You have the right to withhold consent for a search by CPS. If you do not give consent, CPS must establish probable cause and obtain a warrant from a judge or magistrate to conduct a search[1].

The juvenile court system serves a critical role in the legal process, aiming to provide a fair and just environment for young individuals who find themselves entangled in legal matters. However, concerns have been raised by parents, legal experts, and advocacy groups about the effectiveness and fairness of the juvenile court system. In an effort to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness, parents can consider requesting a due process audit on the juvenile court system.

Attention Ohio residents with a juvenile dependency case! It's crucial to be aware of the recent court decision "In re KM" heard in the Supreme Court of Ohio held in 2020. If your dispositional hearing is not held within 90 days the court's must dismiss the case! Get out your documents if you don't have them go to the courthouse and request them! This is a statutory mandate and the juvenile court cannot ignore this mandate!

Investigations conducted by The Marshall Project and NPR have uncovered widespread instances of state agencies taking Social Security money that rightfully belongs to foster children, often without informing them or their parents or guardians. If you have ever been in foster care, you might be concerned if this has happened to you. Understanding whether you were owed Social Security and how much can be a complex task due to intricate laws and procedures involved.

The difference between FDA approved rapid drug screens and non-approved ones is that FDA approved tests have been evaluated and cleared by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA makes sure that tests used to screen for drug abuse are accurate, reliable, and easy to use. Tests that are FDA approved are safe and trustworthy for use in clinics, homes, workplaces, sports, and other settings.