Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Douglas Pilarski
Guide Dog Users Face Access Barriers Despite Legal Protections
2024-05-22
User-posted content
Photo byPinterest
Seeing Eye Survey Finds Majority of Guide Dog Users Report Service Denials.
Findings in a recent report from The Seeing Eye about access barriers faced by guide dog handlers reveal that 80% of guide dog handlers have experienced a denial of service from a rideshare service; 62% of respondents encounter challenges with air travel due to accessibility; and 54% of guide dog handlers surveyed were illegally required to show ID before entering a business.
Photo byPinterest
Access barriers are not just about a denial of service. Service dog handlers face unequal access to goods or services in the form of discrimination, which can include segregated seating at a restaurant, isolation of the team for the convenience of other patrons, requests for pet deposits, or requests for identification.
As a guide dog handler, I find it challenging to encounter access barriers while simply trying to go about everyday life. There’s not only an economic impact from missed opportunities but also an emotional toll of having to justify one's right to be accompanied by a guide dog for independent travel. However, ninety-five percent of guide dog handlers said they would not let these challenges stand in their way. It’sone’s heartening to hear how many of my fellow handlers are prepared to self-advocate. It will continue to exercise its right to work with service animals.-Seeing Eye Sr. Specialist of Advocacy and Government Relations, Melissa Allman.
The report comes from an online survey completed by more than 500 guide dog handlers across the United States and Canada in October and November 2023. The survey asked about access barriers in public places, rideshares, and air travel.
Photo byPinterest
Highlights of the findings: The statistics below were gathered from responses by guide dog handlers in the United States. The report includes results from Canadian guide dog handlers and a breakdown by U.S. Region.
Access to Public Places:
22% of respondents have been told their dogs must wear a vest to enter public places. There is no legal requirement in either country that service animals wear specific equipment to demonstrate that they are, in fact, service animals.
54% of respondents have been told they must show ID to enter a business. ADA regulations make clear that it is illegal in the U.S. to require that people with service animals show ID to enter a business.
55% of respondents were told they could not enter with their dogs because other people accessing the business could have allergies, which is illegal in the U.S. and Canada.
48% of respondents have been told at restaurants that they could only sit outside or far from other patrons with their dogs, even though laws in both countries make it illegal to segregate or isolate patrons due to the presence of a service animal.
75% of respondents reported that within the past five years, they have been prevented from safely working with their guide dogs inside businesses and other public places due to an increase in poorly behaved dogs.
Rideshares:
76% of respondents said they use rideshares to get around with their guide dogs.
81% of respondents who are rideshare users have experienced a denial of service due to the presence of their guide dogs.
45% said they sometimes decide not to bring their guide dogs with them because of their experiences with being denied rides.
More than 62% of respondents had drivers who accepted the ride but complained about having to transport the dog throughout the trip. Some guide dog handlers were charged cleaning fees or received terrible ratings.
Air Travel: About 63% of respondents said they travel by air at least once per year.
62% of respondents have had problems completing the behavior and health attestation forms air travelers with service animals must now complete under current regulations due to inaccessibility or a lack of technology.
55% of respondents have been required by TSA to be separated from their guide dog during screening or to remove equipment from their dogs that is necessary for the dog to work, such as the leash, harness, or collar, even though these demands go against TSA protocol for screening service animals.
These findings come in the wake of the organization’s 95th anniversary, which was accompanied by a call for more robust advocacy for service dog handlers’ rights, and on the heels of a 2019 Seeing Eye study published in the Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness about public interference with guide dogs which also emphasized the need for more education among the public.
Visit The Seeing Eye Advocacy Center at www.seeingeye.org/advocacy for more about guide dog handlers’ rights and to download The Seeing Eye Advocacy App for Apple and Android devices, which contains federal, state, and provincial laws and regulations in the United States and Canada and other educational materials.
Established in 1929, The Seeing Eye provides specially bred and trained dogs to guide people who are blind or have low vision. Seeing Eye dog handlers experience greatly enhanced mobility and independence, allowing them to retain active lifestyles. The Seeing Eye is a 501(c)3 non-profit supported by contributions from individuals, corporations, foundations, endowments, and other planned gifts. The Seeing Eye does not receive government or insurance funding.
The Seeing Eye is a trademarked name and can only describe the dogs bred and trained at the school’s facilities in Morristown, N.J.
If you want more information on The Seeing Eye, please visit www.SeeingEye.org.
SOURCE The Seeing Eye
***
Douglas Pilarski is an award-winning Writer & Journalist based on the West Coast. He writes about luxury goods, exotic cars, horology, tech, food, lifestyle, and business.
You’re welcome to share your thoughts or tell me your story. Please email me here. dp1@sawyertms.com
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0