Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
USA TODAY
The Florida judge who just gave Trump a pass in documents case will now be judged herself
By Chris Brennan, USA TODAY,
3 hours ago
It would be easy to get angry at this point about how law and order is alleged to apply to everyone in America, but former President Donald Trump keeps being issued get-out-of-jail-free cards by judges he appointed.
That's frustrating to fair-minded people, no matter what political party you belong to. We're told as children that nobody is above the law in America and we hope as adults to see that hold true.
But this would be a good time to press pause on our frustration because U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, nominated in April 2020 by Trump for the Southern District of Florida, is likely to face some judgment about her judgment.
We've been here before. It didn't go so well for Cannon.
Judge Aileen Cannon did her part in the Trump document case
Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at the Butler Farm Show in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Brendan McDermid
Cannon's ruling has nothing to do with the merits of the case. Instead, she grabbed hold of a fringe legal argument that Jack Smith, the special counsel appointed in November 2022 by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland to oversee the investigation, was improperly selected.
Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury and charged last summer . His entire legal strategy since then has been to delay delay delay while painting the prosecution as a political vendetta as he seeks another term as president.
In this, Cannon has always seemed more like an eager collaborator than an impartial judge, dragging out the process and leaving legal motions in limbo while sparring with prosecutors. All the while, the clock is ticking down to the Nov. 5 general election. A Trump victory would make the case simply vanish.
Decision to throw out document case started years ago
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, here at her 2020 nomination hearing by a U.S. Senate committee, only July 15, 2024, dismissed the criminal case against former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents, writing that the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith in the case was unlawful. Pool via Reuters
One of Trump's opening gambits in the case in 2022, months before charges were filed, was to ask Cannon to prevent prosecutors from examining the thousands of documents it found – some marked confidential or top secret – in boxes strewn across the ex-president's private club in Florida while executing a search warrant.
Smith appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, known for a certain right-leaning tilt on the political scale, where the case was heard by three judges, including two appointed by Trump.
Those judges, in December 2022, reversed Cannon in a 21-page ruling that ended with what amounted to a scolding for her for what amounted to an attempt at a "radical reordering" to limit how federal judges act in criminal investigations.
"The law is clear," they wrote. "We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so."
Let's not forget the Supreme Court's role in all this
That's the way the law is supposed to work. Everyone is equal. Unless, of course, the U.S. Supreme Court decides otherwise.
The other recent development that has law-and-order fans freaking out was the Supreme Court's July 1 ruling that Trump has immunity for any "official acts" he took as president while attempting to overturn the 2020 election but can still be tried in a separate case in federal court in Washington, D.C., for any "unofficial acts" he took in that attempt.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store .
Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's other six conservatives, three appointed by Trump, in that 6-3 ruling but couldn't resist helping Trump on a legal point that was not part of the case – writing a concurring opinion that questioned whether Smith's appointment as special counsel was legal.
Thomas opened the door for Cannon to toss the documents charges against Trump. And that's just what she did.
Trump, who briefly called for unity after surviving Saturday, was right back at his usual rhetoric Monday, casting his legal troubles as "Political Attacks" while celebrating Cannon's ruling on his social media site , calling for dismissal "of ALL the Witch Hunts."
Trump sees all politics as transactional – if he does something for you, he will expect something from you. Rep. Matt Gaetz, a Florida Republican and avid social media troll, said the quiet part out loud Monday in a post on the site previously known as Twitter with Cannon's official portrait, calling her "Future Supreme Court Justice Cannon."
Speaking of the Supreme Court, the justices took a pass in October 2022 when Trump asked them to overturn the 11th Circuit, which had just overturned Cannon.
If the special counsel successfully appeals the new Cannon ruling and revives the documents case , Trump will certainly try his luck again with our highest court.
Then we'll find out just how many get-out-of-jail-free cards the conservative justices are willing to deal him.
Follow USA TODAY elections columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0