The butting of heads between Man City and the Premier League is likely to continue in the coming months as the Financial Fair Play hearing is underway.
City were charged with breaching over 100 of the Premier League’s FFP rules at the start of 2023 and could potentially be expelled from the top flight if found guilty.
A verdict on this case is expected to be reached at the start of 2023 and lawyer Simon Leaf claims Man City only “won” the APT hearing “on penalties after extra time”.
“It’s hard to argue that Manchester City haven’t won. Maybe you’d say they’ve won on penalties after extra time, because quite conceivably the Premier League can point to a lot of the points in this decision that support the development of its rules, and the rules themselves,” Leaf said.
“It is a relatively minor issue that has been picked up by this panel, which is undoubtedly embarrassing but by no means the end of the world for the Premier League.”
Leaf has also revealed the “main area where the Premier League was successful”.
“My understanding is that Man City were seeking to challenge the rules as a whole, and ultimately, one suspects that what a more decisive victory would have looked like from their perspective would have been the rules being completely scrapped,” Leaf added.
“Where we’ve ended up is that actually we’re likely to see a broader set of rules (to include shareholder loans).
“The panel has said the rules didn’t go far enough and now need to be expanded to cover this particular part of the financing. This is one of the main areas where the Premier League was successful – the panel did quite conclusively say that having these types of (APT) rules in place is lawful.
“It shouldn’t change the value of these deals, but it maybe makes it slightly easier for the clubs to try to challenge a Premier League finding that a deal was not undertaken at fair market value, because clubs will now effectively see the Premier League’s ‘working-out’ at an earlier stage in the process.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0