Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Golf Monthly
How Far Did Old Tom Morris Drive The Golf Ball?
By Fergus Bisset,
7 hours ago
Surprisingly enough, there’s no shot tracer or other analytical data available on Old Tom Morris’ driving distances through the mid part of the 19th century. Trying to ascertain how far he hit a golf ball is, therefore, a little more challenging than having a quick look at the stats on his PGA Tour profile page.
Old Tom’s professional career began in St Andrews as a young apprentice to the great Allan Robertson. The pair were a formidable partnership in challenge matches from the 1840s when Tom was in his 20s. Robertson was a "featherie" ball maker and Old Tom was trained in that discipline. A featherie was a leather ball stuffed with “a hat” full of feathers.
Robertson and Morris would have used featheries on the links of St Andrews and the other courses of East Scotland where the pair earned the nickname of “The Invincibles” for their prowess and competitive record.
The featherie ball could travel around 175-180 yards in standard conditions, but conditions on the links of 180 years ago were seldom standard. If the ground was hard, the ball would roll on as it does today – with a vicious Northeast Fife wind at his back, Old Tom would have been able to propel a drive well over 200 yards. In 1836, a Frenchman who taught at Madras College called Samuel Messieux apparently hit a ball 361 yards across the Elysian Fields at St Andrews. There must have been a howling wind behind for that one!
Old Tom would have increased his driving distance quite significantly when he made the transition from the featherie ball to the gutta percha or "guttie" ball. When Allan Robertson spied Old Tom playing a guttie on the links of St Andrews, a threat to the featherie business, the younger man was fired on the spot.
Made from the dried resin of a Malaysian tree, gutties performed better than a featherie. They travelled a little further, they bounced more too, and rolled out well.
Playing the guttie, Old Tom would have been able to hit the ball somewhere around the 200-yard mark without other variables included. He wasn’t particularly renowned as a powerful player. His great rival Willie Park Snr was known as a more aggressive hitter of the ball and probably had a few yards on Old Tom. When he won his last Open in 1867 (at the age of 46), Old Tom used a club called a ‘driver putter’ to great effect. It kept the ball low under the wind and generated a good amount of run.
Old Tom Morris and his son Young Tommy (Image credit: Getty Images)
Old Tom’s son, Young Tom Morris was an excellent striker of the ball and would certainly have been able to outhit his father as he developed his skills. Young Tom won The Open four times in a row between 1868 and 1872 and, for that spell was undoubtedly the best golfer in the land.
He set a number of records and was known for his skilful, powerful striking. In the 1870 Open, on the first hole at Prestwick, he made a three. That might not seem particularly incredible, but it does when you consider the hole was 578 yards long – He holed his third stroke from around 200 yards out.
How far did Old Tom Morris drive the ball? Well, as we’ve seen, it very much depended on the ground and the weather conditions and it depended on whether he was using a featherie or a guttie ball. A reasonable estimate would be that, in flat calm conditions with a standard amount of run on the links, he would have been able to hit a featherie around 180 yards and (later) a guttie, probably, just a little over 200 yards.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0