Could Shroud of Turin be Jesus’ burial cloth? New study challenges forgery claims

The Shroud of Turin, one of the most enigmatic and studied relics in the world, has long been at the center of a heated debate regarding its authenticity.

Recently, Italian scientists have reignited the controversy. They presented new evidence suggesting that the Shroud could indeed date back to the time of Jesus Christ.

This challenges previous studies that had branded it as a medieval forgery.

The long-standing debate

The Shroud of Turin bears the faint image of a man believed by some to be Jesus Christ. It first surfaced in the 1350s. Its sudden appearance led to immediate skepticism. Notably, Bishop Pierre d’Arcis of Troyes denounced the Shroud as a forgery in 1389.

Despite these early doubts, the shroud continued to captivate both the public and scholars. This led to centuries of scientific inquiry and religious reverence.

In the 1980s, the shroud was subjected to radiocarbon dating, a scientific method used to determine the age of an object containing organic material. The results of this analysis were shocking to many. The shroud was dated to between 1260 and 1390 AD, placing it squarely in the medieval period and branding it as a forgery.

This conclusion was met with mixed reactions, with some accepting the findings as definitive, while others questioned the accuracy of the dating process.

A subsequent study, which suggested that the shroud had wrapped the body of a tortured man, only added to the confusion. However, this study was later withdrawn due to insufficient data to support its conclusions. The mystery of the Shroud remained unresolved, fueling further scientific investigations.

A new approach to dating the shroud

The latest study takes a different approach to dating the shroud. Instead of relying on radiocarbon dating, the researchers used X-ray analysis to examine the linen threads of the Shroud. This method allowed them to trace the Shroud’s origin back to a much earlier period. It potentially dates as far back as 2,000 years ago, around the time of Jesus Christ.

“The experimental results are compatible with the hypothesis that the Turin Shroud is a 2000-year-old relic ,” the study states , suggesting that previous analyses may have been flawed due to contamination.

The researchers believe that the cellulose in the Shroud’s fibers has aged more slowly since the 14th century due to lower room temperatures in Europe. This slow aging process means that most of the cloth’s natural degradation, approximately 90%, occurred before the 1300s.

Despite these promising findings, the researchers caution that their study does not definitively prove that the Shroud was Jesus’s burial cloth . They acknowledge that further evidence is needed to support their conclusions.

Specifically, they point out that the Shroud can only be conclusively dated to 2,000 years ago if it can be shown that the relic was preserved at an average temperature of around 72.5 degrees Fahrenheit (22°C) and a relative humidity of about 55% for the 13 centuries before it emerged in the historical record.

The road ahead: More evidence needed

The researchers also emphasize the need for a “more systematic” X-ray analysis of additional samples from the Turin Shroud fabric to confirm their findings. They suggest that such an analysis could provide more conclusive evidence regarding the shroud’s age and origins.

“The experimental results are compatible with the hypothesis that the Turin Shroud is a 2000-year-old relic,” the researchers reiterate, underscoring the potential significance of their findings. If their hypothesis is correct, it could have profound implications for our understanding of the shroud and its place in history.

The latest research opens new avenues for historians and scientists alike to test their theories about the Shroud’s origins. For instance, they can explore whether the conditions described in the study match any known historical locations where the shroud could have been kept before its documented history began in the 14th century. This line of inquiry could help to piece together the shroud’s mysterious past and determine whether it truly dates back to the time of Jesus.

The research was published in the journal Heritage .