While Clarie's story begins in 1945, where she works as a Second World War nurse and is wedded to Frank Randall, the plot sees her accidentally traveling through a time portal. She initially time travels by mistake, then later makes a conscious decision to return to the future before journeying back again with the intent to reunite with love interest, Jamie Fraser.
One reader expressed their frustration on Reddit after spotting what they judged to be an oversight by Claire in the third installment, Voyager. The user, @SorryIAmNew2002, commented: "I'm on book three to keep busy while waiting for the new episodes to drop and I love it so far."
"But what I cannot shake is the frustration about how Claire didn't research more before going back. Obviously in Jamaica, she entered unforeseen terrain but once or twice now she's been clueless about a cure because she didn't know which herbs to use or because she was unsure of history questions."
"If I were to take such a huge step as to travel back in time I would've gobbled up all the books I could find about medical plants and relationships/important people from that time. Maybe I'm just being too harsh on her, I'm not a huge fan of Claire. But it really bugs me reading."
Claire-defenders instantly sprung to her aid, explaining that the fan had overlooked two things: "how much actual research has been done/published on the subject and how easy it is to find."
They explained that access to knowledge differed in Claire's era: "In Claire's time, it's not so simple to find that sort of esoteric knowledge. That's the whole reason she and Frank were in Inverness the first time, he had to go find the original documents and oral histories."
Clarifying Claire's urgency, another fan reasoned: "I would think she wanted to travel as soon as possible because all she knew is that Jamie was in Edinburgh a year earlier. The longer she waited the greater the chance he'd be somewhere else."
For the latest local news and features on Irish America, visit our homepage here .
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0