In 2019, there were 231 Alamedans experiencing homelessness, up 13% from 2017. Of these, 132 were unsheltered. There was no count in 2020 due to the pandemic.
However, the number is likely higher due to COVID-19 and other stressors of the last two years. As Mayor Ashcraft remarked, “Anecdotally, we see encampments where we hadn’t seen them before.”
Still, with fewer than 300 people experiencing homelessness and only half unsheltered on any given day, the City believes that the scale of its problem is solvable.
The Strategic Plan
The strategic plan is a roadmap to prevent and reduce first-time homelessness, shorten the time of remaining homeless and decrease returns to homelessness. The plan has three goals; each contains three implementation strategies:
Goal 1: Secure a housing future for all Alamedans
Strategy 1.1: Assess and use available public and private land for housing
Strategy 1.2: Protect and expand affordable housing through local policy
Strategy 1.3: Coordinate housing solutions with the County and neighboring cities
Goal 2: Increase access to homeless emergency response services
Strategy 2.1: Develop flexible resources for diversion, prevention, and housing retention (Diversion targets those trying to gain entry into a shelter; prevention targets people at imminent risk of homelessness.)
Strategy 2.2: Provide low-barrier, temporary housing solutions
Strategy 2.3: Expand outreach and supportive services to unsheltered households
Goal 3: Mobilize the citywide response to homelessness
Strategy 3.1: Engage the community on the regional crisis of homelessness
Strategy 3.2: Strengthen the Homeless Response System infrastructure
Strategy 3.3: Ensure ongoing supportive services funding for assisted households, such as for health care and substance use, to prevent returning to homelessness
The plan contains 51 action steps and a timeframe for each strategy, responsible parties, stakeholders, and potential funding sources. Specified metrics will measure progress and success.
Public Comment
Eight public speakers and one correspondent shared their comments. While speakers generally supported the plan, most expressed concern that proposed service sites are primarily in the West End and Alameda Point. One speaker noted that only one is east of Webster Street of ten potential properties considered for the program.
Speaker Biggs, Executive Director of the Alameda Point Collaborative, the largest supportive housing community in Alameda County, argued for policies that would limit the ability of those opposed to serving the homeless to stop or delay the implementation of these services.
He said, “We don’t have to look far to see that opposition to homeless services can increase the cost of projects by millions of dollars and delay their implementation by years while our unhoused neighbors live in unbearable conditions.”
Council Debate
Council Member Knox-White praised the plan. Still, he added that he would like to ensure a more equitable distribution of service sites across the island while recognizing that the West End has the most available land.
Council Member Herrera-Spencer said that she appreciated the quantity of data about Alameda’s unhoused population. However, she criticized the plan’s goals as too vague and not specific to Alameda. She also expressed concern about duplicating the Housing Authority’s work rather than working with and supporting them.
Community Development Director Lisa Maxwell responded that her department has been exploring specific projects as outlined in the action steps and would come to the Council with those soon.
She added that it was not her department’s intention to take the base of the Housing Authority. Instead, they sought to capitalize on rare opportunities for state and County funding that would allow them to create affordable housing and to house the homeless.
Vice Mayor Vella felt the plan’s goals were “spot on,” saying that the plan’s objectives were broad goals by which the Council could direct staff. She understood that staff would return to Council once they determined what was feasible relative to the funds and parcels available. She also supported more equitable distribution of services across the island.
Council Member Daysog said that as specific projects arose, he would support them. Still, he took issue with the plan not requiring clients to participate in related services such as job training as a condition of accessing housing.
Council Member Knox White remarked that when past administrations have tried to make people do things to get housing, they found that people aren’t ready to undergo drug and mental health treatment and job training until they have a place to live first.
Mayor Ashcraft noted that California has hundreds of thousands of unhoused in a state that is the fifth-largest economy globally. She added, “But I’ve seen what it looks like when you put people into supportive housing, and it doesn’t take a lot of money to put it up. There are various ways of doing it, but when it comes with wraparound services such as job, mental health, and substance abuse counselors, interview coaching, and counselors for children, then magic starts to occur. You need to give people a chance.”
Final Vote
In the final vote, Mayor Ashcraft, Vice Mayor Vella, and Council Member John Knox White voted in favor. Council Member Herrera-Spencer voted against, and Council Member Daysog abstained so that a 3-1-1 vote approved the plan.
Mayor Ashcraft concluded by inviting residents experiencing housing insecurity to call 211 or visit ac-housingsecure.org for information about how eligible Alameda tenants can still be protected from eviction if they apply for rental assistance from the Alameda County Housing Secure program.
This is original content from NewsBreak’s Creator Program. Join today to publish and share your own content.
Comments / 5
Add a Comment
David Ransom
2021-10-12
First off, are they really residents of Alameda that lost their housing, or is the city spending tax dollars for people that wandered in?
Jewal13
2021-10-11
error in previous comment: treatment for drug/alcohol
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.