Judge grants KFOR temporary restraining order in First Amendment case
By Adria Goins/KFOR,
24 days ago
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – A federal judge has granted KFOR a temporary restraining order for 14 days against Superintendent Ryan Walters and Press Secretary Dan Isett on Wednesday.
The order prevents three things: 1) denying KFOR access to the room in which Oklahoma State Board of Education meetings are held; 2) barring KFOR from Walters’ follow-up press conferences; and 3) physically obstructing or impeding KFOR’s reporters when they attend these meetings or press conferences.
In the court order, Federal Judge Bernard Jones said “with these standards in mind, and after considering all written submissions, evidence, and arguments presented at Wednesday’s hearing, the Court finds that KFOR is likely to succeed on its First Amendment claim.”
The State Board of Education’s next board meeting is Thursday, September 26 th .
Isett appeared in court Wednesday, sitting in the gallery.
Walters was not at the hearing.
Judge Jones listened to arguments from attorneys on both sides during the hour-long hearing. Courtney Corbello, attorney for the Institute for Free Speech, represented KFOR. She argued it was a clear case of discrimination and First Amendment violation
“Defendants were very clear that the reason that they are denying KFOR entry into these press conferences and these board meetings is because they don’t like what they’re reporting,” said Corbello.
On multiple occasions, News 4 has not been allowed at State Board of Education Board main meeting room and press conferences. The state told the court, KFOR has been denied access because they “do not report the truth.”
Judge Jones responded during the hearing by saying, “As a public official, you’re not always going to like everything the media is saying, but that comes with the territory. It comes with the job.”
In the filing, Judge Jones said “the Court finds this justification to be little more than a ruse, masking an effort to punish a news organization for its editorial stance.”
The court order went on to say, “newsgathering is the lifeblood of free speech.”
The state also argued that the press room was at capacity and there were security issues, something Corbello said was never mentioned before this suit.
“There were so many opportunities before and after the lawsuit was filed to say, well, here are the legitimate reasons why we’re doing this,” said Corbello. “Instead, like I said in court, they’ve doubled down.”
Cameras are not allowed in federal courtrooms, but KFOR did ask Isett if he had a reaction to the hearing as he was leaving the courtroom and he said, “No.” News 4 also requested a statement from OSDE, Walters, or Isett via email after the restraining order was granted.
“A judge can give KFOR privileges, but that doesn’t keep the organization from being fake news.” Isett said in response to the statement request.
Attorney General Gentner Drummond responded to the case Wednesday.
“Keeping KFOR, the oldest and one of the most reputable news agencies , out of press conferences seems to be the opposite of good government, the opposite of transparency and accountability,” said Drummond. “That’s what journalists must do to hold elected officials and appointed officials accountable.”
The way I see it is, if they have nothing to hide, then they shouldn't be worried about the press being in there! Correct?
MrSkr8Up 83
23d ago
This is PRIVILEGE BULLSHIT. You know who the CONSIDERED TRUE AMERICANS ARE when they have the ABILITY to do what A HIGH END MUSIC ARTIST CAN'T. That's keep EVERYONE out of a WELL PRESIDENTED RIGHT TO KNOW about a HIGH PROFILE CASE. That is sooo UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Bending rights and laws to your will because WHO YOU ARE OR KNOW. Your average 👉🏿👨🏻🦰👦🏼👩🏻🦲👱🏻👈🏿 can't do it. Even the average 👉🏿👱🏻👩🏻🦲👨🏻🦰👦🏼👈🏿 gets the 🥷🏿🥷🏾 treatment my the JUDGE AND PAPARAZZI! 2 branches of government just told all of us to 🖕🏿off. Judicial and Legislative....how about those rights huh?
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.