Mountain View
Liberty Lighthouse
The Tyranny of Veloumonus Laws
In the early years of the American Republic, the founding fathers were acutely aware of the dangers posed by excessive and complex legislation. Thomas Jefferson, one of the most vocal critics of legislative overreach, warned against the perils of an overactive legislative body. His admonitions, grounded in a profound understanding of human nature and the principles of liberty, are even more pertinent today as we struggle with the consequences of an ever-expanding legal and regulatory framework.
Restoring Constitutional Balance: Proposed Amendments to Limit Federal Power
The United States Constitution was designed by the Founding Fathers to create a federal government of limited powers, carefully balancing authority between the national government and the states. However, over the years, certain constitutional clauses have been broadly interpreted, allowing federal power to grow beyond what the framers intended. To restore the balance and ensure that federal authority remains within its proper bounds, a series of clarification amendments are being proposed. These amendments aim to reinforce the original principles of limited government and federalism that the Constitution was built upon.
The Tyranny of Excessive Laws: Jefferson's Warning Today
Thomas Jefferson, one of America’s most influential Founding Fathers, had deep concerns about the dangers of excessive and complex legislation. In the early years of the Republic, he warned that an overactive government could entangle its citizens in a web of legal obligations too complex to understand, let alone follow. Today, Jefferson’s warnings are more relevant than ever as we grapple with an overwhelming legal and regulatory framework that impacts every aspect of our lives.
Constitutional Challenges: Bypassing Senate in U.S. Foreign Aid
The U.S. Constitution provides a clear blueprint for managing foreign relations and allocating funds for international purposes. Yet, much of today's U.S. foreign aid is distributed without the Senate’s ratification of treaties. This practice raises significant constitutional questions and challenges the principles laid out by the framers of the Constitution.
The Treaty Trap: How Bypassing the Senate Undermines the Constitution
The U.S. Constitution provides a clear framework for how our nation should enter into international agreements. Specifically, the Treaty Clause in Article II, Section 2 mandates that the President can make treaties only with the "advice and consent" of the Senate, requiring a two-thirds majority for approval. This requirement ensures that significant international commitments reflect the broader will of the American people through their elected representatives.
From FDR's Threat to Conservative Shift: The Supreme Court's Evolution
The history of the U.S. Supreme Court reveals a complex relationship with the other branches of government, especially when facing the pressures of executive power and popular sentiment. A prime example of this occurred during Franklin D. Roosevelt's (FDR) administration, whose New Deal programs reshaped the American political and economic landscape. The Court’s response to these changes led to a judicial philosophy that prioritized congressional authority—a philosophy now being reconsidered, prompting renewed calls for "court reform" from progressive lawmakers.
Liberty Lighthouse
6+
Posts
38+
Views
Liberty Lighthouse is guiding the way back to constitutional principles with free white papers, articles, the Founders' Constitution, and online courses.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.