The first stations could get them in a matter of days.
Weapons detection systems coming to NYC subway stations
It was only a few months ago that Adams had detectives demonstrate a weapons detection system in which a red box shows up on an iPad if a rider has a gun, a knife or other dangerous item. Now, he's ready to install them in a few select locations.
"They should be rolled out in the next few days," Adams said.
The system that will be installed was developed by a company called Evolv; its systems are also used in several city hospitals . But with technology advancing all the time, the city is still doing a global search, not ruling out the possibility that other companies will invent a better detection system.
"People are carrying a lot of different things. It's not just guns -- it's knives, it's other things, so I mean, if they have a way to check for it, then it can't hurt," one rider said.
"Whatever would help the general public to be safe would be a good idea," another rider said.
It is unclear which stations will be the first to get the system. The MTA said it's up to City Hall, but City Hall sources tell CBS New York while the exact locations are still being discussed by the NYPD and the MTA, it's not going to be a secret. The mayor said that once the stations are chosen, they will be made public and riders will be told what the exact rules are.
Opponents call system "ineffective," say they trigger false alarms
The Legal Aid Society released the following statement Wednesday:
"Shortly after the Mayor announced the gun detection system pilot earlier this year, multiple media outlets confirmed what we already know: that these invasive technologies are ineffective and frequently trigger false alarms. Even the CEO of a weapon detection-system company acknowledged that subways were not a 'good use-case' for the technology.
"New Yorkers want a safe subway system that works. These scanners will create significant inconvenience, adding congestion and delays to an already overburdened system.
"Even worse, they are an unjustified invasion of privacy, and put people's lives - particularly those of our clients, the majority of whom are people of color - at risk from the panic that an inevitable false alarm would induce.
"The Mayor has opted to move forward before even posting a final policy, in violation of the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology Act, shirking his legal obligations under the law.
"This Administration's commitment to unreliable, unproven, and invasive policing technology comes at the expense of all New Yorkers, and does not address the root cause of public safety. We're considering all of our options should this wrongheaded plan move forward."
"They did thousands of tests, thousands, to gauge the success of it. We're extremely impressed with the outcome," Adams said.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0