Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
New York Post
X investors who helped Elon Musk buy company include top VC firms, Saudi prince and Jack Dorsey
By Ariel Zilber,
13 hours ago
Several of Silicon Valley’s top venture capitalists, a Saudi royal and fund linked to disgraced hip hop mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs are among the investors that helped Elon Musk acquire X for $44 billion two years ago, according to a court filing.
Noted VC firm Andreessen Horowitz, Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud and Twitter founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey are among those who own part of X, it was revealed the filing.
X was forced to reveal the list of investors who helped owner Elon Musk acquire the company in 2022 for $44 billion. AFP via Getty Images
X had resisted attempts to have the list of investors revealed. The company is being sued by several former Twitter employees who claim that Musk violated their arbitration agreements by failing to pay certain fees after he bought the company.
Jacob Silverman, a technology journalist who was represented by attorneys for the nonprofit Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, filed a motion asking the court to unseal the documents. His request was granted by US District Judge Susan Illston.
Katie Townsend, legal director for the Reporters Committee, praised Illston’s ruling, which confirms “the interest of the general public in knowing who owns X.”
Andreessen Horowitz, the venture capital firm co-founded by Marc Andreessen, owns a stake in X. Steve Jennings
To complete the purchase, Musk borrowed $13 billion from several banks, including Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Barclays.
Collectively, Musk is on the hook for annual interest payments to the banks that add up to more than $1 billion.
An analysis by The Wall Street Journal earlier this week found that the $13 billion in loans that Musk took from the banks have turned out to be the worst merger-finance deal for lenders since the recession of 2008-2009 — mainly due to the fact that they have been unable to sell the debt to other investors.
Banks who extend loans for mergers and acquisitions make money on the fees that they collect after getting a buyer to relieve them of the incurred debt within a short period of time.
Larry Ellison, co-founder of software giant Oracle, gave Musk $1 billion to help finance his acquisition of what was then known as Twitter. AP
But X’s weak finances means that selling the debt would put the banks at a loss. As a result, the loans are what are known in industry jargon as “hung” — meaning that they have remained stuck on their balance sheets.
According to the Journal, the loans that were made to Twitter have been unsold for longer than every similar deal that was made since the 2008-2009 crisis.
Earlier this year, documents leaked by X showed that its value had fallen by more than 70% — to around $12.5 billion.
Fidelity, the mutual fund giant that is also among investors who helped Musk acquire the company, marked down the value of its shares somewhere between $15 billion and $16 billion.
Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the billionaire investor, also owns a stake in X. AP
At the time of the acquisition, Musk and the lenders knew that the $44 billion that he paid was way above the actual value of the company.
But the banks decided to extend the loans to Musk anyway because of the allure of servicing the man who at the time was the world’s wealthiest person, according to the Journal.
After Musk bought Twitter, he reduced the company’s work force by some 80%. Musk has also struggled to win back advertisers who fled the site in response to his loose content moderation policies that critics say has allowed hate speech to proliferate.
The Post has sought comment from X.
For top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0