Retired couple lose life savings in bitter feud with neighbor over fence
By SWNS,
2024-08-27
A retired couple have said they’ve spent their life savings in a bitter legal row with their former neighbor over a fence put up on their shared driveway.
Graham and Katherine Bateson said they have sunk $59,551 (£45,000) into lawyers’ fees since their late neighbor Wendy Leedham placed the fence alongside their bungalow.
The couple sought an injunction to have it taken down, saying it obstructed the entrance to the drive of their property after it was put up in 2019.
The Batesons argued that when they bought their two-bedroom house for $39,039 (£29,500) in 1987, they were told it shared a drive with their neighbor.
They said they were told there was a featureless boundary marked between the two properties which should not be built on.
But their neighbor obtained legal advice saying she could put the fence up between the properties in Snettisham, Norfolk.
She passed away months before the hearing in May 2021 at the age of 74.
Leedham’s three-bed former home is now on the market for $496,263 (£375,000) with agents Sowerbys.
Sowerbys’ 12-page brochure makes no mention of the fence or the boundary dispute and the Batesons fear a new owner could replace it.
Katherine, a retired factory supervisor, said, “We’re still living in fear they will put another fence up when there shouldn’t have been one in the first place.”
The Batesons say the shared drive and open boundary was later confirmed by a surveyor’s report after the mediation hearing.
Retired window cleaner Graham Bateson, 75, took the law into his own hands in September 2022.
He said, “I took the fence down and I got arrested for criminal damage.
“They had me locked up for 12 hours on a Sunday with no food until midnight.”
Last December, the charge was dropped because the Crown Prosecution Service deemed it was not in the public interest to proceed.
Graham said by then, the couple could not continue their legal fight because they could no longer afford to.
He said: “We saved and worked hard. It’s all gone now.”
Both parties paid their own legal costs.
The fence has not been rebuilt, while the Land Registry has rejected the revised deed because it was not happy with the way the Batesons’ signatures were witnessed.
Sowerby’s and Leedham’s family were contacted for comment.
For the latest in lifestyle, top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com/lifestyle/
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.