Since January, just 10 subway stations have received metal barriers designed to prevent deadly falls and shoves onto the tracks, officials confirmed to The Post.
Even the handful that have gone up didn’t impress straphangers such as Lily, a 25-year-old rider who called the barriers inside the Grand Street L station “stupid.”
“I guess it’s better than nothing, but there’s so much space between them that it’s like pointless,” she said Friday.
Subway platform barriers have only gone up at 10 stations since January. Robert Miller Many straphangers questioned the railings’ effectiveness. Robert Miller
Other straphangers questioned the railings’ effectiveness, noting they still left a wide gap for falls, jumps and shoves.
“It doesn’t do anything,” said Jeanette, 75, a home health aide from the East Village.
“Anybody just can go and throw them over. I don’t think it’s any safer in here if you get pushed.”
The platform railing pilot launched in January amid pressure to prevent attacks such as the fatal 2022 push of Michelle Go at the Times Square station.
MTA officials touted the railing as a low-cost safety measure, as compared to bigger platform doors. Robert Miller
MTA officials eyed full-sized platform doors, but argued they could only feasibly be installed in a fraction of the subway system’s 472 stations — and would still cost $7 billion .
The roughly hip-high metal barriers that first sprang up to straphanger befuddlement at 191st Street station were deemed a low-cost, first-step solution as compared to the bigger gates being long-slated to be tested for $100 million at three other stations .
An MTA spokeswoman didn’t have a price for the smaller barrier test. She told The Post the stations being tested are along the L and 7 lines, but didn’t provide details as to why those were selected.
She also didn’t have details on how widely MTA officials planned to expand the pilot.
“The goal is to install at one to two stations a month, depending on timing for the delivery of materials,” she said.
“The goal is to install at one to two stations a month, depending on timing for the delivery of materials.”
Platform railings have been installed so far at five L line stations: Bedford Avenue, Dekalb Avenue, First Avenue, Grand Street and Morgan Avenue.
Erin Hussey, 29, was skeptical the railings would stop New Yorkers from harming themselves. Robert Miller
The remaining railings are in the Fifth Avenue 7 line station, the 57th Street F station, the 191st Street 1 line station and Clark Street 2 and 3 line station, officials said.
New Yorkers and tourists in those stations told The Post Friday that the barriers couldn’t hurt, but also didn’t make them safer.
Anna, a 30-something straphanger in the Morgan Avenue L station, said subway shovings weren’t the primary danger many of her female neighbors faced in that very station.
Intern Avita Islam, 21, compared the barriers unfavorably to the ones she recently saw in London. Robert Miller
“I don’t fear being shoved as much as I worry about someone attacking myself or a neighbor on an empty platform, dark street, stairwell, or anywhere that is hidden from view and easily accessible to people who want to hurt others,” she said. “Men follow me at night, sometimes starting in subway stations. That is a real, repeating danger.
East Village denizen Erin Hussey, 29, had mixed feelings about the railings’ effectiveness, especially when it came for people with mental health issues.
“I lost a partner to suicide,” she said. “I know if somebody’s gonna do it, they’re gonna do it.”
Avita Islam, 22, a Northeastern University student in the city for an internship, compared the relatively small barriers to the bigger platform doors she recently saw in the London Underground.
“I don’t think it significantly makes me feel safer, because it’s not like it’s not doing much,” she said.
For the latest metro stories, top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com/metro/
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0