Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • CBS Minnesota

    Trump seeks to overturn criminal conviction, citing Supreme Court decision

    By Graham Kates,

    20 hours ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2QTBNO_0uBn2BAL00

    The Supreme Court says Trump has some immunity. What happens now? 08:22

    Donald Trump is trying to leverage a Supreme Court decision holding that presidents are immune from federal prosecution for official actions to overturn his conviction in a New York State criminal case.

    A letter to the judge presiding over the New York case is not yet public. It was filed Monday after the Supreme Court's landmark holding further slowed the former president's criminal cases .

    A spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg declined to comment when asked about Trump's effort to overturn the conviction, which was first reported by The New York Times .

    Trump's criminal case in New York is the only one of four against him to go to trial. On May 30, a unanimous jury concluded Trump was guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an effort to cover up reimbursements for a "hush money" payment to an adult film star. Trump signed off on falsifying the records while he was in the White House in 2017.

    Monday's Supreme Court decision extended broad immunity from criminal prosecutions to former presidents for their official conduct. But the issue of whether Trump was engaged in official acts has already been litigated in his New York case.

    Trump sought in 2023 to move the case from state to federal jurisdiction. His lawyers argued that the allegations involved official acts within the color of his presidential duties.

    That argument was rejected by a federal judge who wrote that Trump failed to show that his conduct was "for or relating to any act performed by or for the President under color of the official acts of a president."

    "The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the matter was purely a personal item of the president — a cover-up of an embarrassing event," U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein wrote. "Hush money paid to an adult film star is not related to a president's official acts. It does not reflect in any way the color of the president's official duties."

    Trump initially appealed that decision, but later dropped it.

    His case went to trial in April, and soon after the jury's unanimous decision finding him guilty, Trump vowed to appeal the conviction.

    Trump is scheduled to be sentenced July 11 . Prosecutors were expected to file a sentencing recommendation Monday. That filing has not been made public.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local New York State newsLocal New York State
    Most Popular newsMost Popular

    Comments / 0