Supreme Court to Review Homeless Ban in Nine Western States

Photo by@Rick Davis/dailymail.co

• California Governor Gavin Newsom is seeking the Supreme Court's support to enforce a ban on homeless encampments in public areas.
• The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals previously ruled that such removals violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on 'cruel and unusual punishment'.
• The Supreme Court will review whether the lower court's decision on this matter was excessive.

In a significant development impacting nine western states, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case, backed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, regarding the potential ban of homeless individuals from public areas.

This move comes amid increasing concerns in San Francisco, where a surge in business exodus is being witnessed. Newsom, a liberal governor, is demanding more authority to dismantle homeless camps, a response to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that such removals are in breach of the Eight Amendment's prohibition on 'cruel and unusual punishment'.

The Supreme Court's decision to review this ruling on Friday signals a critical juncture in the ongoing debate over handling homelessness in urban areas. Newsom has been vocal about his commitment to addressing the homeless crisis in California, especially in the context of San Francisco's challenges with drug use and business departures. He has urged the Supreme Court not to limit the state's ability to manage this issue effectively.

California has been actively investing in initiatives to combat homelessness, including behavioral and mental health reforms. Newsom claims substantial progress under his governance, citing the removal of thousands of homeless encampments and the rehousing of tens of thousands of individuals. However, the issue has persisted, with San Francisco grappling with a significant number of drug-related deaths and a noticeable return of homeless encampments post-major events like the APEC summit.

The ruling in question impacts a wide geographical area, including states like Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. It also involves court decisions that have halted bans on homeless individuals using basic items for shelter against the elements. The Supreme Court's upcoming examination of this issue holds significant implications for the policies governing homelessness across these states.

SOURCE