Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • LiveScience

    Eye of the Sahara: Mauritania's giant rock dome that towers over the desert

    By Sascha Pare,

    2024-05-31

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=1PMF3P_0tbf3Ens00

    QUICK FACTS

    Name: Eye of the Sahara

    Location: Adrar Plateau, Mauritania

    Coordinates: 21.114714464479544, -11.394300583868517

    Why it's incredible: The eye is so big you can see it from space.

    The "Eye of the Sahara" — also known as the "Eye of Africa" or the Richat structure — is a giant rock dome, carved with concentric rings, that looks like a giant bullseye when seen from above. The eye is visible from space and has been known to astronauts and scientists since the earliest crewed missions in the 1950s, according to the European Space Agency (ESA).

    Estimates of the Eye of the Sahara's dimensions range from 25 to 31 miles (40 to 50 kilometers) in diameter. The eye forms a near-perfect circle in the desert of Mauritania, which initially led scientists to think it was an impact structure from a meteor. However, subsequent research found the dome was shaped by tectonic uplift during the Cretaceous period (between 145 and 66 million years ago) and laid bare through erosion.

    The Eye of the Sahara stands out like an oversized ammonite among an immense sea of sand known as the Erg Oudane, which stretches roughly 350 miles (560 km) east to Mali. Ergs are areas of desert that span at least 48 square miles (125 square kilometers) and feature wind-swept sands with little to no vegetation . The eye towers about 660 feet (200 meters) above the surrounding sands, which rise against its southern edge and occasionally obscure parts of the structure in photographs, according to ESA .

    Related: Mystery of enormous Saharan 'star dune' finally solved — and it wasn't what scientists were expecting

    The center of the Eye of the Sahara is a round plateau of limestone and breccias — sedimentary rocks with large, broken fragments that are cemented together by a fine-grained matrix — according to a 2021 study . The rest of the eye slopes down from this plateau in a circular pattern of ridges and grooves that have been sculpted by wind and water over the eons. The ridges are mostly made of resistant quartzite, while the grooves consist of less-resistant sedimentary rocks that wear away more quickly.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0e3U12_0tbf3Ens00

    A view from space of the Eye of the Sahara shows the surrounding sand dunes, which are part of the Erg Oudane. (Image credit: Stocktrek Images, Inc. / Alamy Stock Photo)

    The reason why the eye is so round remains unclear, according to the Lunar and Planetary Institute . Erosion has exposed four types of igneous rock — gabbros, rhyolites, carbonatites and kimberlites — which are younger than the center of the eye, indicating that jets of molten rock rose and solidified at the surface. Several faults are also visible on the outer rings of the eye, suggesting that layers of rock shifted apart in the process.

    The Eye of the Sahara is a geological marvel, but it also holds archaeological significance, according to Geographical , a magazine published by the U.K.'s Royal Geographical Society. Excavations have unveiled 2-million-year-old Acheulean and pre-Acheulean tools that are associated with two species of ancient human ancestors: Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis .

    RELATED STORIES

    China's 'heavenly pits': The giant sinkholes that have ancient forests growing within

    Fairy Chimneys: The stone spires in Turkey that form 'the world's most unusual high-rise neighborhood'

    Cave of Crystals: The deadly cavern in Mexico dubbed 'the Sistine Chapel of crystals'

    Proponents of the debunked myth of Atlantis — a "lost" island subcontinent idealized by some as an advanced, utopian society — claim the Eye of the Sahara is evidence of the city described by Plato in his "Timaeus" and "Critias" dialogues.

    But "together, modern archaeology and geology provide an unambiguous verdict," Ken Feder, a professor emeritus of archaeology at Central Connecticut State University, previously told Live Science. "There was no great civilization called Atlantis."

    There's no need to turn to mythology for answers when geology provides enough of its own.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular
    LiveScience11 days ago
    LiveScience12 days ago

    Comments / 0