Supreme Court rules in favor of White House on social media post removal

The U.S. Supreme Court has sided with the Biden administration in a lawsuit over pressure to take down social media posts deemed to contain misinformation, striking down a lower court's ruling from Murthy v. Missouri. This case stems from critiques over the government's handling of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The lawsuit alleged the Biden administration went too far in asking platforms to moderate content . Challengers said the government wrongly pressured the companies to regulate posts.

In July 2023 , a Louisiana-based U.S. district judge barred officials from “communication of any kind with social-media companies urging, encouraging, pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later narrowed the scope of the injunction, but still required the White House, FBI and top health officials not to “coerce or significantly encourage” social media companies to remove content the Biden administration considered misinformation.

In a 6-3 vote Wednesday , June 26, the justices ruled the individuals and the two states that brought the lawsuit — Louisiana and Missouri — did not have the legal standing to seek an injunction against the Biden administration. The court noted the “platforms had independent incentives to moderate content and often exercised their own judgment.”

The post Supreme Court rules in favor of White House on social media post removal appeared first on Straight Arrow News .