Open in App
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Newsletter
  • UPI News

    House Republicans sue attorney general in federal court over Biden audiotapes

    By Chris Benson,

    10 hours ago

    July 1 (UPI) -- The House Judiciary Committee on Monday sued Attorney General Merrick Garland in order to obtain the audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hur's interview of President Joe Biden related to his handling of classified documents after exiting the vice presidency.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3OZokm_0uAtrv3800
    Following June's contempt of Congress vote, Attorney General Merrick Garland accused House GOP of turning a "serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon." File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI

    The civil action lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Washington requests, among other things, an injunction to order Garland "to produce the audio recordings of the Special Counsel's interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer," the president's book ghostwriter, to the Republican-lead House Judiciary Committee chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan , R-Ohio.

    Biden has claimed executive privilege while refusing to turn over the audio recordings to the House. While the transcripts of Biden's two-day interview have been available online and total 258 pages, Garland and the Justice Department contend that executive privilege is a valid reason to deny access to the recordings.

    It happened the same day a Supreme Court ruling stated that former President Donald Trump has presidential immunity, but only for official acts while in office as president.

    The topic has remained an ongoing partisan point of contention between the White House and Republicans on Capitol Hill.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4BhS9v_0uAtrv3800
    The topic of the Robert Hur audiotapes has remained an ongoing partisan point of contention between the White House and Republicans on Capitol Hill. Last week, a Florida House Republican announced a GOP plan to have Garland taken into custody by the House sergeant-at-arms by utilizing a largely mundane and hardly-used House tool. File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI

    Last week, a Florida House Republican announced a GOP plan to have Garland taken into custody by the House sergeant-at-arms by utilizing a largely mundane and hardly used House procedural tool.

    That was preceded in early June when the House -- after the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees voted in May to push the resolution -- voted 216-207 largely along party lines told hold Garland in contempt of Congress for his refusal to provide the audio recordings of Biden's Oct. 8 and Oct. 9 interviews by Hur despite the transcript.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4AJ6Eb_0uAtrv3800
    After Garland’s contempt of Congress vote, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said at the time that it is "up to Congress -- not the executive branch -- to determine what materials it needs to conduct its own investigations and there are consequences for refusing to comply with lawful Congressional subpoenas." Photo by Jemal Countess/UPI

    Following the vote, the attorney general accused the House GOP of turning a "serious congressional authority into a partisan weapon," followed then by a recent GOP-lead effort days ago to hold Zwonitzer, likewise, in contempt of Congress.

    That came after House Speaker Mike Johnson recently sought a court order to get the long-awaited audiotapes wanted by House Republicans from the attorney general after the Justice Department declined to prosecute Garland over the matter.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=0gqeqi_0uAtrv3800
    U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, looks on as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks at a press conference in June following a Republican Conference meeting on Capitol Hill. Jordan is House Judiciary Committee Chairman. Photo by Jemal Countess/UPI

    After Garland's contempt of Congress vote, Johnson said at the time that it is "up to Congress -- not the executive branch -- to determine what materials it needs to conduct its own investigations and there are consequences for refusing to comply with lawful Congressional subpoenas."

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular

    Comments / 0