Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Sportscasting
Gulfside Casino Partnership Files Lawsuit Against Cherokee Nation Businesses
By James Foglio,
18 days ago
Gulfside Casino Partnership filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in Pulaski County Circuit Court against Cherokee Nation Businesses (CNB), citing coercion and illegal use of practices to secure a casino license.
Other named defendants in the case include Cherokee Nation Entertainment, Pope County Judge Ben Cross, the Pope County Quorum Court, and the Arkansas Racing Commission.
Gulfside Casino Partnership argues Cherokee Nation Businesses’ Economic Development Agreement, letters are invalid
The Arkansas Racing Commission last week awarded the license to Cherokee Nation Entertainment, the tribe’s entertainment and gaming company. It was the state’s fourth and final casino license.
Additionally, Gulfside Casino Partnership said the regulations are being met to apply for the license.
Although the Mississippi-based casino applied for the Pope County casino gaming license in 2019, its award was met and reversed by the Arkansas Supreme Court due to contention with the issuance of the letter by the Pope County Judge.
In the complaint, Gulfside Casino addressed the contract, stating that the “Economic Development Agreement” (CNB EDA) would be constructed to pay an “economic development fee” to towns and cities within Pope County, other governmental entities, and specific private and public institutions and entities.
The CNB EDA puts officials in the position that if they support another proposal, “Pope County is in jeopardy of receiving nothing if CNB or its designee is ultimately awarded the license,” the complaint states.
CNB EDA binds County Judge Ben Cross to issue a letter of support, according to the complaint
According to the lawsuit, the CNB EDA binds County Judge Ben Cross to issue a letter of support. It also requires Pope County Quorum Court to issue a resolution of support for a Pope County casino gaming license exclusively to CNB or an entity designated by CNB in exchange for cash payments to the county and other entities.
The lawsuit claims Gulfside’s rights, status, and legal obligations are diminished by the CNB EDA.
“The discretion of the County Judge and Quorum Court cannot be bought, to the exclusion of all other interested operators, with funds denominated ‘Economic Development’ funds; thus, the CNB EDA, the letter of support, and the resolution of support issued in conformity with it are invalid and should be so declared,” the lawsuit says.
According to Johnson v. Board of Commissioners, 135 S.E. 618, 621 (N.C. 1926), the lawsuit states, “Such officials cannot bind themselves by such agreements or contracts, nor can they be held bound by the courts.”
Because the CNB EDA is void against public policy, the letters and support issued are also void, per the lawsuit.
CNB EDA is an effort to coerce county officials, the lawsuit alleges
The lawsuit states, “Simply stated, the CNB EDA is an effort to coerce county officials to exercise a constitutional duty in a particular way through the payment of money for the public benefit.”
Amendment 100 requires the Racing Commission to award a casino gaming license to a casino applicant to be located in Pope County. Applicants must be located “within two miles of the city limits of the county seat.”
Therefore, neither Judge Cross nor the Quorum Court have the authority under Amendment 100 to award a casino gaming license or select the licensee.
Gulfside Casino is requesting that the CNB EDA be voided as it claims it was against public policy.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0