Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
WyoFile
Jackson reps defend development fees to panel tasked with cutting red tape
By Angus M. Thuermer Jr.,
2024-07-23
User-posted content
A legislative panel charged with reducing regulations received pushback Thursday from advocates who don’t want the state to limit how local governments use rules and fees to mitigate the affordable housing crisis.
Some towns and counties — Teton County and the Town of Jackson have drawn the most scrutiny — impose fees to offset a project’s impacts on infrastructure, services and even housing supply.
But those fees have to be justified, task force co-chair Sen. Mike Gierau (D-Jackson) said as the panel considered a Property development exactions bill that would limit development fees.
“We want to make sure we [set fees] in a way that passes legal muster.”
Sen. Mike Gierau
“We can’t pull numbers out of the air,” he said. “We want to make sure we [set fees] in a way that passes legal muster.”
Rep. Clark Stith (R-Rock Springs) repeated the allegation, voiced last year by Sen. Ogden Driskill (R-Devil’s Tower) that some local governments may be “ abusing local control ” by imposing fees unjustly. Some fees are not levied to mitigate impacts but rather “to pursue a low-growth or no-growth strategy,” Stith said Thursday.
But representatives from Teton County, where communities struggle to manage growth and solve affordable housing challenges, rejected Stith’s assertions.
“We have used our legally based housing mitigation program since 1995 as one tool to share the cost of affordable housing with developers and landowners who are creating jobs for employees who cannot afford to live in Jackson,” Jackson Town Manager Tyler Sinclair wrote the committee.
Town of Jackson lobbyist Andy Schwartz told the task force his community has hewed to U.S. Supreme Court decisions that limit fees to those that are directly attributable and proportional to a development’s impact. The town is not in the habit of “shaking down businesses,” he said.
“How does a community pay for [development] costs,” without the authority to set and levy fees, Schwartz asked the committee. “The developer has some level of responsibility,” according to court decisions, he told the panel.
On the protest issue, the task force will consider three options with regard to the proportion of neighbors necessary to mount a challenge to a zoning adjustment. At its next meeting in October, it also will consider the building permit notice bill.
Sen. Mike Gierau (D-Jackson) at the Wyoming Legislature’s Travel, Recreation, Wildlife and Cultural Resources Committee meeting in Evanston in June 2023. (Mike Koshmrl/WyoFile)
But task force members were hesitant about what Stith called “a cumbersome approach” and a “new regulatory burden” in that permit bill. Members are wary that the task force is adding, not reducing, red tape.
“It looks like we’re adding more things on the plate,” Sen. Wendy Schuler (R-Evanston) said.
The regulatory panel tabled a bill Thursday that would require towns larger than 4,000 residents to adopt several “ housing strategies ,” such as automatically allowing accessory housing units in some single family neighborhoods.
“City, town and county regulations,” like the property development exactions bill, would limit development fees. It would prohibit towns larger than 4,000 residents from charging more than administrative costs for a building permit.
The Housing on public land bill would make affordable housing a priority on state land, a move that is arguably unconstitutional on school trust property, the deputy director of the Office of State Lands and Investments told the task force.
The corporations committee will meet later this month in Evanston.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0