Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • HealthDay

    City vs. Country vs. Suburbs: Who's Happier?

    By Dennis Thompson,

    18 hours ago

    Key Takeaways

    • City dwellers are less likely to be happy

    • Happiness is highest in suburban “Goldilocks zones”

    • Happiness in an urban area depends largely on wealth

    TUESDAY, July 23, 2024 (HealthDay News) -- City dwellers are less likely to be healthy, happy and well-off than people living outside urban areas, a new study reports.

    Instead, there’s a suburban “Goldilocks zone” between cities and rural areas where people are happiest, researchers report.

    “Areas near cities but beyond their boundaries… show the highest and most equal levels of psychological satisfaction,” said lead researcher Adam Finnemann , a psychologist and doctoral student with the University of Amsterdam’s Center for Urban Mental Health.

    For the study, researchers analyzed data on 156,000 people aged 40 and older drawn from the UK Biobank, a major health research database.

    The researchers used a new method of assessing whether someone lived in a city, suburb or rural area, based on both their distance from the nearest city center as well as the population density of that urban area.

    Thus, the team accounted “for the fact that living 15 kilometers from London differs from living 15 kilometers from Leeds—one is still urbanized while the other is countryside,” Finnemann said in a university news release.

    Results showed that while urban residents had the highest incomes, this didn't make them happier.

    Instead, people in highly urban areas scored worse on a series of eight measures covering well-being, social satisfaction and economic contentment.

    Despite these scores, people are flocking to cities. The percentage of people living in cities has surged from 10% in the 1910s to a projected 68% by 2050, researchers said in background notes.

    This is due to an “urban desirability paradox,” where cities are popular even though moving to one makes the average person more miserable.

    The study, published July 19 in the journal Science Advances , also showed there’s a high amount of inequality regarding the happiness to be found in city living. The financially well-off enjoy much more satisfaction with life than those scraping by, and that inequality is highest near city centers.

    These results “suggest cities disproportionately benefit the already advantaged,” Finnemann said.

    The most happiness was found in suburbia, researchers said.

    However, Finnemann can’t guarantee that a person will be happier if they ditch the sticks or flee the city for a suburb.

    “These optimal distances might result from happy individuals moving there rather than the locations themselves enhancing individual well-being,” Finnemann said. “Thus, our findings do not imply that anyone will benefit psychologically from moving to these areas.”

    More information

    Harvard Medical School has more on happiness .

    SOURCE: University of Amsterdam, news release, July 19, 2024

    What This Means For You

    Moving to either the country or the city won’t necessarily make a person more happy, experts say.

    Expand All
    Comments / 0
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Most Popular newsMost Popular
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment10 days ago
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment13 days ago
    Emily Standley Allard8 days ago
    A Piece of Travel24 days ago
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment26 days ago
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment25 days ago
    Emily Standley Allard26 days ago
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment2 days ago

    Comments / 0