Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
The Guardian
‘Morally, nobody’s against it’: Brazil’s radical plan to tax global super-rich to tackle climate crisis
By Fiona Harvey Environment editor,
1 day ago
A Brazilian farmer surveys the damage done to her cassava plantation by recent wildfires. Photograph: Ricardo Moraes/Reuters
Proposals to slap a wealth tax on the world’s super-rich could yield $250bn (£200bn) a year to tackle the climate crisis and address poverty and inequality, but would affect only a small number of billionaire families, Brazil’s climate chief has said.
No government was speaking out against the tax, said Ana Toni, who is national secretary for climate change in the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
“Our feeling is that, morally, nobody’s against,” she told the Observer in an interview. “But the level of support from some countries is bigger than others.”
However, the lack of overt opposition does not mean the tax proposal is likely to be approved. Many governments are privately sceptical but unwilling to publicly criticise a plan that would shave a tiny amount from the rapidly accumulating wealth of the planet’s richest few, and raise money to address the pressing global climate emergency.
Janet Yellen, the US Treasury secretary, told journalists in Rio that the US “did not see the need” for a global initiative.
“People are not keen on global taxes,” Toni admitted. “And there is a question over how you implement global taxes.” But she said levying and raising a tax globally was possible, as had been shown by G7 finance ministers’ agreement to levy a minimum 15% corporate tax .
“It should be at a global level, because otherwise, obviously, rich people will move from one country to another,” she said.
Only about 100 families around the world would be affected by the proposed 2% levy , she added. The world’s richest 1% have added $42tn to their wealth in the past decade, roughly 36 times more than the bottom half of the world’s population did.
The question of how funds raised by such taxation should be spent had also not been settled, noted Toni.
Some economists have argued that the idea was more likely to be accepted if the proceeds were devoted to solving the climate crisis than if they were used to address global inequality. Other experts say at least some of the money should be used for poverty alleviation.
Miliband confirmed at the meeting that the UK’s climate aid contribution of £11.6bn to the developing world by 2026 would stand; the previous government had considered reneging on it. Civil society groups in the global south welcomed his announcement But Toni said the UK should go further and present a new and tougher plan for cutting emissions.
Toni pointed to the last Cop, in Dubai last December, when countries agreed to “transition away” from fossil fuels , in order to limit global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. She praised Labour’s plans to stop licensing new oil and gas fields in the North Sea.
“We all decided together about transitioning away from fossil fuels,” she said, “and now is the time to implement what we said. Developed countries need to lead the way. Stopping financing oil and gas extraction is the first step.”
Brazil is expanding its oil and gas production and Toni argued that poorer countries should be allowed to continue to produce and use fossil fuels for some time longer while developed countries curbed theirs.
“All income for some developing countries is too vital for development,” she said. “For some economies, this is the only income they have. So we need to think of how that transition would happen.”
The UK could help through its expertise in finance: “We need to get all our creative minds on this – the UK is especially creative on finance.” she said. “We are looking forward to working with the UK government on a new financial mechanism to tackle climate, but also preserve nature.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
Welcome to NewsBreak, an open platform where diverse perspectives converge. Most of our content comes from established publications and journalists, as well as from our extensive network of tens of thousands of creators who contribute to our platform. We empower individuals to share insightful viewpoints through short posts and comments. It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency: our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. We strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation. Join us in shaping the news narrative together.
Comments / 0