Danielle Collins accuses Iga Swiatek of being fake after heated exchange at Olympics
By Dylan Svoboda,
2024-07-31
Danielle Collins isn’t happy with how Iga Swiatek handled the end of their quarterfinal match at the Paris Olympics.
Collins retired from the match during the third set on Tuesday with dehydration and cramps, handing a spot in the semifinal to Swiatek.
But it wasn’t the loss that set Collins off post-match as the two rivals were seen having a heated exchange after the American retired down 4-1 in the third set.
Swiatek’s reaction to her win irked Collins, who said the world No. 1 women’s tennis player came off as disingenuous in the aftermath.
“I told Iga she didn’t have to be insincere about, you know, my injury,” Collins said, via tennis reporter Christopher Clarey . “There’s a lot that happens on camera, and there are a lot of people with a ton of charisma and come out and are one way on camera and another way in the locker room. And I just haven’t had the best experience, and I don’t really feel like anybody needs to be insincere. They can be the way that they are. I can accept that, and I don’t need the fakeness.”
At the start of the third set, Collins had hit Swiatek with a backhand in the midsection that sent the world’s top player to her knees at Roland Garros.
Collins blamed Olympic organizers for not having enough water available for players.
“It’s incredibly disappointing because you work so hard your whole life to make it to the Olympics, and this is my first and my last Olympics, and something like not having adequate water on court,” she said. “That’s really frustrating and it’s really sad.”
“This is going to be my last season, actually, competing,” she said. “I don’t really know exactly when, but this will be my last season and I’m really looking forward to that.”
The latest feud adds to what has been a drama-filled Paris Olympics in tennis.
On Tuesday, American Emma Navarro ripped Zheng after losing during the third round of women’s singles play, saying she “didn’t respect [Zheng] as a competitor.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.