A new analysis of soil samples from the Giza plateau reveals copper and arsenic contamination dating back over 5,000 years from using metal tools, especially those used to build the pyramid complex.
The study, published in the journal Geology, assessed a sediment core drilled at the foot of the pyramids near the ancient Khufu Harbor, close to the Nile River.
Archaeologists suspect this now-disappeared arm of the river made it possible to transport building materials used in constructing the pyramids over 5,000 years ago.
A massive workforce of about 7,000 to 20,000 people, including scribes, masons, metal workers, carpenters, and foremen, worked on-site to complete the pyramid-building project , according to the new study.
Research hints that the copper tools used by labourers were alloyed with arsenic to strengthen the blades, chisels, and drills.
They say the harbour played a key role in transporting materials for the construction of the necropolis, and was also the site of a major copper toolmaking industry.
The findings trace the origins of metal contamination at the site to around 3265 BC, much earlier than initially anticipated.
Metal contamination appears to have peaked 750 years later around 2500 BC when pyramid construction was in late stages, persisting till about 1000 BC.
“We found that significant local contamination occurred during the regnal years of Kings Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure, consistent with metalworking during the preparation and construction of the edifices,” scientists wrote.
The levels of metal contamination seem to be about five to six times higher than their natural background amounts detected in the environment, researchers say.
The discovery also suggests construction of the pyramid complex in Giza likely began earlier than previously thought, coinciding with a time when Nile levels began to drop.
Even as the Nile River receded and the Khufu Harbor shrank further, metalworking seems to have continued.
Copper contamination remained high even during a period of civil unrest around 2200 BC when the Nile reached its lowest level, hinting that the workforce was resilient.
While copper in limited quantities is essential for human life, exposure to higher levels as discovered at the site may have caused adverse effects on both humans and wildlife such as vomiting, diarrhea, and nausea.
It remains unclear if ancient Egyptians faced these symptoms due to metal contamination or how they coped.
“While the pyramid complex led to the creation of an outstanding cultural legacy for humanity, it also marked the onset of significant human-caused metal contamination at Giza,” researchers concluded.
slaves didn't build the pyramids, they were built by craftsmen who had knowledge of advanced technology for their day. To think they could be built by unskilled labor is mindless.
apexpredator
9d ago
Kushite and/or Kemetiu Africans of the Kemet Empire. Egypt or Egyptian is invasion and imitation thousands of years later having absolutely nothing to do with the Nile Valley's Dynastic creation. the sphinx is African. do better so called professionals. the lies are over.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.