Amid a Southern California heat wave, about 300 advocates for rent control — with two 10-foot “greedy landlord” puppets — rallied Thursday in downtown Los Angeles, chanting: “The rent is too damn high!”
Many advocates, including representatives from the AIDS Healthcare Foundation and UNITE HERE Local 11, held signs in support of Proposition 33 and against Prop. 34 , which will both be decided by California voters in November. Voters shot down similar rent control propositions in 2018 and 2020, but advocates are hoping this year will be different.
Prop. 33 would allow cities to expand rent control, which is currently not allowed for single-family homes or apartments built after 1995. As a result, renters such as Nallely Gomez, an organizer with UNITE HERE Local 11, say they see their rents increase every year.
Gomez: “My rent literally went up $149 yesterday. Everyone who works here should be able to live here.”
On the surface, Prop. 34 doesn’t have much to do with rent control, requiring some California health care providers to spend 98% of their revenue from a federal discount prescription program on direct patient care. But the measure, supported by the California Apartment Association, appears to target the AIDS Healthcare Foundation — which spends some of that money on rent control and other political advocacy.
“Prop. 33 and Prop. 34 are intrinsically linked,” said Susie Shannon, campaign manager for Yes on 33.
In other election news:
Health tax measure: Other than Gov. Gavin Newsom raising concerns about taking away budget flexibility, there hadn’t been real opposition to Prop. 35 , which would require the state to spend money from a tax on health plans on Medi-Cal and is backed by California’s health care industry. That changed Thursday with the launch of a coalition that includes advocacy groups for children, seniors, good government and health care access. They say that the measure would roll back investments in community behavioral health, Alzheimer’s services and other programs. “Prop. 35 throws away the hard work communities have done to make health care more equitable,” Kiran Savage-Sangwan, executive director of California Pan Ethnic Health Network, said in a statement.
Asian American voters: A new study being released today by several advocacy groups says that three-quarters of California’s Asian American voters are absolutely certain they will vote in November, but 46% of those surveyed have not been contacted by either major political party. The report suggests that Democrats may have the best chance: 43% identify with the party, compared to 19% Republican. And there are quite a few potential Asian American voters in California: 4.5 million — nearly a third of all eligible Asian voters in the U.S. The report also says that the top policy priorities are the economy, health care and inflation.
Voter education: CalMatters is hosting a series of public events to inform and engage voters. The first one is next Thursday in Eureka, co-hosted by Lost Coast Outpost . There’s more information here .
It’s still unconfirmed when hearings on the bills will happen. A reminder: Only bills tied to the subject of the special session can be debated.
In other Capitol news:
Prison abuse: The U.S. Justice Department is investigating the state’s corrections department and whether it failed to protect prisoners inside two women’s prisons “ from sexual abuse by correctional staff .” At the California Institution for Women in Chino, a lawsuit filed on behalf of 21 women accuses a former officer of abuse and rape beginning in 2014. And in the last two years, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed from prisoners at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla alleging officers of abuse over the last decade. There’s also an internal investigation following an Aug. 2 incident at the Chowchilla facility in which officers locked more than 100 women in a prison cafeteria for several hours, reports The Appeal . The California Legislative Women’s Caucus says it welcomes the federal investigation, and hopes it will help end the abuse .
Political ad: A bill on Newsom’s desk would let casino-owning tribes sue their competitors, private card rooms. If passed, local governments could lose tens of millions of dollars in tax revenues, including in the district represented by Assemblymember and congressional hopeful, Evan Low , writes CalMatters Digital Democracy reporter Ryan Sabalow . Surprisingly, the Cupertino Democrat backed the measure . And now the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians — one of the bill’s biggest supporters — has bought radio ads supporting Low’s campaign. Both the tribe and Low’s campaign insist there is no connection. But good governance advocates argue the move is an example of political quid pro quo. Learn more about the ads in Ryan’s story.
AI legislation: The Legislature sent more than a dozen bills to the governor that seek to regulate artificial intelligence. CalMatters tech reporter Khari Johnson looks into a handful of them , including a controversial measure to require AI models to be tested for catastrophic harm . Various critics of the bills say the proposals either do not go far enough to curb the most harmful aspects of AI, such as its potential to discriminate, or that the bills are so broad that they could stifle competition. Read more about the AI bills in Khari’s story.
Both Assembly Bill 2104 and Senate Bill 895 would allow 10 community college districts (out of the state’s 73) to offer bachelor’s degrees in nursing. While that wouldn’t directly solve a statewide nursing shortage, hospitals increasingly prefer to hire nurses with college degrees.
California State University opposes both measures, out of concerns that community colleges — with their lower tuition and costs — will siphon away prospective students. Cal State’s director of health care workforce development told CalMatters that the system’s online programs and bachelor’s degree programs in partnership with other community colleges can meet the bills’ goals.
There’s also some doubt whether the bills are necessary. Due to an increase in nursing program enrollment, the state may have all the nurses it needs by 2027, according to a 2023 UC San Francisco report . Nursing shortages in certain regions, such as the Central Valley and the Central Coast, may persist however.
Speaking of jobs: Since the passage of the federal $1.2 trillion infrastructure package in 2021, California has received more than $42 billion. But who gets to contract with state agencies to build these projects could reduce the state’s wealth inequities, reports CalMatters freelance writer Alisha Green . She profiles an organization that aims to boost opportunities for historically underutilized businesses, including minority-, women- and veteran-owned businesses.
CalMatters events: The next one is next Thursday, moderated by CalMatters water reporter Rachel Becker on the battle over California’s groundwater. Register here to attend virtually. On Sept. 19, CalMatters economy reporter Levi Sumagaysay , who is covering the homeowners’ insurance crisis , will interview California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara. Register here to attend in person at our Sacramento offices or virtually.
Other things worth your time:
Some stories may require a subscription to read.
CA may require fashion industry to take back old clothes for free // The Mercury News
CA lawmakers got tougher on crime . What will Newsom decide? // Los Angeles Times
Research has shown that any price control by the government will have the opposite effect, that is, the price will go up. That's why it's so ludicrous for Kamala to declare price control on supermarkets and food companies, while alleging price gouging by food manufacturers and supermarkets. Here is the same picture: rent gouging landlords vs renters the victims. There will be less rentals in LA as rent goes stagnant.
HowdyDoody
09-09
Insurance, HOA fees, and repair costs have gone through the roof
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.