Appearing on the “Today” show in Australia Monday, the supermodel got into a heated debate with co-hosts Karl Stefanovic and Amelia Adams following her revelation that she refused chemotherapy from 32 doctors.
Macpherson, 60, last week revealed that she was diagnosed with breast cancer seven years ago and is now finally in remission.
But on Monday’s show, Macpherson said that the media attention surrounding her treatment was drawing attention away from other key points made in the book.
“The book isn’t about cancer. And the focus on it is really distorted,” the Aussie catwalk star said. “It’s distorting the rest of the gems that are in the book.”
“I know, but you’ve found yourself in the middle of a debate that I think so many women are having with not just the community, but with the conventional medical profession,” Stefanovic said, adding that it’s a “good thing” that she has “sparked the debate.”
Following her lumpectomy seven years ago, the WelleCo founder was diagnosed with HER2-positive estrogen receptive intraductal carcinoma — a type of breast cancer characterized by a higher level of a protein that can help breast cells multiply quickly.
Macpherson said her decision to forego chemotherapy wasn’t made lightly.
“Just to be clear, I sought a lot of medical advice,” she said. “It was very interesting, because every doctor has a different opinion on how to treat my specific case of breast cancer.”
“There was no clear path and there was no guarantees either way,” she continued. “So, I just made a decision based on all the information that I gathered and what felt right for me.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Comments / 0