Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • Orlando Sentinel

    Judge: Orange County’s growth-control measures can go on November ballot

    By Ryan Gillespie, Stephen Hudak, Orlando Sentinel,

    10 days ago
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3ShOgJ_0vYhxC1C00
    State Senator-elect Carlos Guillermo Smith talks during the press conference advocating for a rural-boundary charter amendment outside the Orange County Commission meeting in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, July 30, 2024. Willie J. Allen Jr./Orlando Sentinel/TNS

    A pair of growth-control measures set to face Orange County voters in November can remain on the ballot, surviving an effort by a landowner to have them tossed out.

    Chief Judge Lisa Munyon denied a request for a temporary injunction filed by Lake Pickett North LLC, which owns property in rural east Orange. County leaders have rejected various development proposals on those ranchlands over the years, and one of the ballot measures enacts even stricter rules to develop.

    Lake Pickett North, which most recently proposed the “Sustanee” project of 1,800 homes, alleged the county hadn’t prepared a business-impact statement prior to adopting the initiatives as required by state law, thus making the referendum null and void.

    The suit challenged two separate county charter amendments: One would place further protections for rural areas within a so-called “rural boundary,” while the other would require a super-majority vote from county commissioners to approve voluntary annexations of unincorporated land into cities.

    However, Munyon said she found flaws in the developers’ arguments and was hesitant to block voters from having their voices heard. In particular, she said that because the referendums were approved as resolutions rather than ordinances, a business-impact statement wasn’t required.

    “The Court recognizes that granting the requested injunction would be a drastic remedy because it would effectively resolve the case by granting Plaintiff its ultimate requested relief, which is to prevent the voters of Orange County from deciding whether to approve these amendments to the County Charter,” she wrote.

    Commissioner Emily Bonilla, whose district includes the Lake Pickett property, said she was thrilled with the ruling.

    “I’m glad the court upheld the community’s right to be heard by rejecting the Lake Pickett North ballot injunction,” she said. “East Orange County residents deserve a say in decisions that impact their future, and I’ll continue to stand with them.”

    Brent Spain of Theriaque & Spain, the firm representing Sustanee developer Sean Froelich and Lake Pickett North LLC, said his team was disappointed. “We are currently evaluating filing an appeal and amending the pending complaint to contest the county’s later-adopted resolutions approving the proposed charter amendments,” he said in an email.

    The swift ruling allows the Orange County Supervisor of Election’s Office to begin mailing out overseas ballots as soon as this Friday, with other ballots to come. Had Munyon ruled to strike the referendums from ballots, a redesign may have delayed things.

    “We appreciate the judge’s timely ruling in this matter as it will allow us to move froward with ballots for Orange County voters,” said Christopher Heath, a spokesperson for the elections office.

    rygillespie@orlandosentinel.com

    Expand All
    Comments /
    Add a Comment
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt11 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt18 days ago
    Robert Russell Shaneyfelt6 days ago

    Comments / 0