Open in App
  • Local
  • U.S.
  • Election
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • New York Post

    Four things modern medicine got totally wrong — with dire consequences

    By Hailey Eber,

    9 hours ago

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3mz5CS_0vYj0rlP00

    Doctor doesn’t always know best.

    In his new book, “Blind Spots: When Medicine Gets It Wrong, and What It Means for Our Health,” Dr. Marty Makary examines how some of the medical establishment’s biggest health recommendations in recent decades have been unfounded and even dangerous.

    “Much of what the public is told about health is medical dogma — an idea or practice given incontrovertible authority because someone decreed it to be true based on a gut feeling,” writes Makary, a surgeon and professor at John Hopkin University.

    Here, a looks four instances where many doctors got it wrong.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3vjQYO_0vYj0rlP00
    A new book looks at the effect of “groupthink” on public health.
    Wrong: Young children should avoid peanuts to be safe

    In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued a recommendation that children under age 4 and pregnant and lactating women avoid peanuts if there was potentially a high risk of allergy.

    That recommendation was based on a UK recommendation connected to a 1996 study from the British Medical Journal that actually found no association between pregnant mothers eating peanuts and their baby developing an allergy.

    Furthermore, the study’s lead author, Jonathan Hourihane, told Makary that he opposed the guidance. “It’s not what I wanted people to believe,” he said. “It’s ridiculous.”

    I’m a doctor — here’s how to prevent and manage headaches and migraines

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4f7ud0_0vYj0rlP00
    Doctors once advised that young children and pregnant women avoid peanuts in the name of safety, but allergies spiked in the wake of the guidelines. yaroshenko – stock.adobe.com

    In the wake of the AAP guidelines, peanut allergies saw a huge increase  — and became increasingly deadly.

    “Suddenly emergency department visits for peanut anaphylaxis — a life-threatening allergic swelling of the airways — skyrocketed, and schools began enacting peanut bans,” writes Makary.

    In 2007, roughly 5% of medical claims for anaphylactic food reactions were for peanuts; by 2016, 25% were.

    By 2019, there were reports that one in every 18 children in America had a peanut allergy.

    “The AAP recommendation had created a vicious cycle,” Makary writes. “The more prevalent peanut allergies became, the more people avoided peanuts for young children. This, in turn, caused more peanut allergies. “

    Today, many doctors recognize that early exposure to peanuts is best, but “the remnants of the peanut avoidance recommendation still linger,” write Makary. The US and UK have the highest rates of peanut allergies in the world.

    Wrong: Hormone replacement therapy is dangerous

    For decades HRT was considered something of a godsend for women in menopause, helping with symptoms such as hot flashes and depression, while also lowering the risk of heart attacks and Alzheimer’s.

    But in 2002, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) declared that HRT resulted in a “26% higher incidence of breast cancer .

    New study finds top medical schools value left-wing activism over science

    The pronouncement came from a study of nearly 17,000 women by Stanford and Harvard researchers, but it wasn’t backed up by the actual data.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=2SDNhF_0vYj0rlP00
    A generation of women avoided using hormone replacement therapy because of unfounded breast cancer fears. Cultura Creative – stock.adobe.com

    There was no “statistically significant difference in the rates of breast cancer among women on HRT compared to those who took a placebo,” writes Makary. “The authors had misrepresented their data. But amazingly, hardly anyone noticed.”

    Those who did and spoke out were drowned out by the masses. “US prescriptions for HRT plummeted by 80%, and they remain low to this day,” Makary notes. “Tragically, a generation of millions of women were denied a life-changing treatment.”

    Wrong: Antibiotics are harmless

    There’s no question that antibiotics save lives, but Makary notes that they’re wrongly thought to have no downsides — and are being overprescribed to potentially devastating effect

    With ear infections in children, doctors once did a careful examination to distinguish between a bacterial and a viral infection, the latter of which is much more common and can’t be treated with antibiotics.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3QDHuC_0vYj0rlP00
    Antibiotics save lives, but they can have negative effects. Steve Cukrov – stock.adobe.com

    Today, doctors, aside from specialists, might not have the knowledge or time to make such a distinction — or it might be a telehealth visit — so they’ll just write a prescription for antibiotics to cover their bases.

    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR MORNING REPORT NEWSLETTER

    But, he writes, “the overprescribing of antibiotics is causing more harm that we may realize” — namely to gut health, which can potentially lead to a host of health issues.

    For a study published in 2021, Mayo Clinic followed all children born in Olmsted County, Minnesota for 11 years. Of those kids, about 10,000 were given an antibiotic in their first two years life. They had significantly higher rates of obesity, asthma, learning disability, ADHD and celiac disease compared to the roughly 4,000 children who did not receive antibiotics early in their life.

    Mayo Clinic doctors recently repeated the study, and it yielded similar results.

    Other research has suggested that everything from the rising number of food allergies to higher rates of breast and colon cancers in recent decades may be due, in part, to our declining microbiome health.

    Wrong: Fluoride in drinking water is a must

    Fluoride was first added to tap water in America starting in the 1940s to prevent tooth decay, and it’s now in roughly two-thirds of American homes. (In Europe, only about 3% of residents have it.)

    An analysis by the Cochrane Collaboration —  an international non-profit that reviews medical research — found “very little contemporary evidence” that water fluoridation successfully prevented cavities, noting that studies suggesting otherwise were dated, poorly designed and did not take into account the fact that many people now use fluoride toothpaste.

    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=199rZ3_0vYj0rlP00
    Fluoride was first added to drinking water in America in the 1940s, but some are now questioning the practice. Kitch Bain – stock.adobe.com

    Meanwhile, some research has raised concerns about the effect of fluoride on gut health and IQ in babies, as it can settle in fetal brain regions and effect neurotransmitters.

    A 2019 study in JAMA Pediatrics found that “maternal exposure to higher levels of fluoride during pregnancy was associated with lower IQ scores” in young children.

    More research is needed, but Makary notes this is yet another assumption we shouldn’t take for granted.

    “If someone tells you that fluoridation of the water supply is entirely safe and essential for public health, that is an opinion, not a fact.”

    For the latest in lifestyle, top headlines, breaking news and more, visit nypost.com/lifestyle/

    Expand All
    Comments / 1
    Add a Comment
    opzwill1
    2h ago
    95% of peanut allergies are due to introducing peanuts too late
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News
    Total Apex Sports & Entertainment5 hours ago

    Comments / 0