In this article, I explore the historical context, development, and persistence of the belief that governments are controlled by Satan, offering a detailed and accurate account.
In medieval Europe, the Church held immense power, and accusations of witchcraft and heresy were widespread. Political opponents or anyone seen as a threat to the Church's authority were often branded as allies of the Devil. This era saw religious beliefs and political power deeply intertwined, leading to the persecution of those accused of being under satanic influence.
The Reformation and Enlightenment
16th to 18th Centuries
The Protestant Reformation of the 16th century sparked intense religious and political turmoil. Reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin accused the Catholic Church of corruption and even claimed it was under Satan's influence. This criticism reflected their broader concerns about the Church's moral failings and its hold on political power.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, the Enlightenment shifted the focus toward rationalism and skepticism of traditional authorities, including the Church. Yet, fears of secret societies and satanic influence remained. The rise of groups like the Freemasons fueled conspiracy theories, with some believing these organizations were part of a satanic scheme to control governments.
Two quick side notes: First, I was raised Lutheran and had to attend Catechism, where we memorized Martin Luther’s teachings as part of the confirmation process. Second, my father was a Mason, but he never really talked about it, so when I hear curious things about that group, I’m never quite sure what to believe.
The Modern Era
19th and 20th Centuries
In the 19th century, the rise of mass media enabled conspiracy theories to reach a wider audience. One of the most notorious examples was the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," a fabricated document claiming to expose a Jewish plot for world domination, which included satanic conspiracy elements. Though thoroughly debunked, it fueled anti-Semitic beliefs and influenced other conspiracy theories about global control.
As mentioned in my opening statement, during the late 20th century, the United States experienced the "Satanic Panic," a moral hysteria that swept through the 1980s and early 1990s. Sensationalized media reports, questionable testimonies, and flawed legal proceedings fueled widespread fears of satanic ritual abuse. While these claims focused primarily on alleged abuse, they also contributed to broader fears of satanic influence infiltrating institutions, including the government.
In recent decades, the internet has significantly amplified conspiracy theories, making them easier to spread and gain a following. Modern conspiracy theories often mix historical fears with contemporary anxieties about globalization, technological control, and political corruption. For example, groups like QAnon, which primarily targets the political right, promote the belief that a secret cabal of elites—frequently described in quasi-religious, even satanic terms—controls global politics and engages in sinister activities.
On the left, conspiracy theories also arise, though they focus on different concerns. One example is the belief that large corporations or powerful interest groups—such as Big Pharma or Big Tech—manipulate global affairs for profit and political control. Some left-leaning conspiracy theories suggest corporate influence on government, particularly through lobbying or media control, undermines democracy and public welfare.
These theories can stoke fears of widespread corruption and exploitation, feeding a narrative that powerful entities are colluding to suppress the working class or block progressive reforms. While these theories may not be as centralized as QAnon, they still reflect deep mistrust in institutions and authority.
Sadly, many conspiracy theories that were initially dismissed as outlandish or implausible have later been proven true, or at least grounded in some factual elements—but often only after years or even decades have passed. This is a future topic I will be writing about. This delayed revelation of the truth can result from factors such as government secrecy, corporate interests, media biases, and the complexity of gathering evidence. The time it takes for the truth to emerge often deepens public mistrust of institutions, fueling the creation of more conspiracy theories.
This delay can profoundly affect public trust. When people discover that theories once dismissed as outrageous or paranoid were actually true, it fosters deeper suspicion of institutions, making individuals more likely to believe future conspiracy theories without proper evidence. This mistrust can snowball, creating an environment where official narratives are questioned, even when based on fact.
Moreover, when the truth comes to light long after the fact, it can be difficult to hold those responsible accountable. By the time the full scope of a conspiracy is exposed, many key players may no longer be in power, or the political landscape may have shifted, leaving little opportunity for justice. This sense of impunity can further erode confidence in the system.
Critical THINKING
As someone who values critical thinking, I find it essential to analyze these theories with a rational approach, assessing their sources, evidence, and underlying motivations. While fears of malevolent control tap into primal human anxieties, more people today should exercise critical thinking to navigate these narratives. Rational analysis and empirical evidence remain vital tools for understanding the intricate nature of political and social dynamics.
From my perspective, it seems that humanity itself embodies the symbol of Satan. We often act with cruelty, selfishness, and greed. Since humans are the ones in control of the world, it raises the question: "Is the world, in a sense, controlled by Satan?"
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.