Referee from Chiefs-Falcons game forced to release statement explaining controversial call after backlash
By Ryan Sanudo,
24 days ago
A REFEREE has shared the reasoning for a missed penalty call toward the end of the Kansas City Chiefs’ 22-17 win over the Atlanta Falcons in Week 3.
The sequence came during the fourth quarter of the Sunday Night Football NFL primetime game for all eyes to see.
Atlanta Falcons star tight end Kyle Pitts being held by Kansas City Chiefs safety Bryan Cook late in the fourth quarter of the Week 3 game between the two teams NBC Pitts seen not making the catch as Cook tackles him NBC
With a little under four-and-a-half minutes left in the game, the Falcons offense faced a 3rd-and-5 on the Chiefs’ six-yard line.
The play saw Kirk Cousins throw a ball to tight end Kyle Pitts but he couldn’t make the catch .
However, Kansas City safety Bryan Cook was making contact with him throughout the play.
Cook was even bear-hugging Pitts before the ball got to the vicinity of the tight end.
The Chiefs should’ve gotten flagged for pass interference, but there was no penalty flag thrown on the play.
After the game, referee Tra Bale opened up on the reason for the official not making the penalty call.
“That is a real-time call that officials have to make a judgment on,” Blake explained in the pool report.
“From the angle that they had at the time, they did not feel that there was a foul committed.”
Pass interference can’t be reviewable.
As a result, officials have to make a quick decision on the spot when it comes to calling a penalty or not.
In this case, the refs believed that the play didn’t warrant a flag.
“That’s a real-time judgment call for us,” Blake said. “We do the best we can to make that decision.”
If the officials called a penalty on the Chiefs, the ball would’ve been given a first down on the one-yard line.
Still, there was close to four minutes left in the game.
Chiefs superstar Patrick Mahomes signaling for a play in the first half of the team’s 22-17 victory over the Falcons Reuters
If the Falcons scored a touchdown, they would’ve been up 23-22 with pending the extra point.
Atlanta would’ve likely attempted the two-point conversion to go up 25-22.
The Chiefs would’ve had a chance to take the lead or possibly tie up the game if the Falcons had made the conversion – especially with superstar Patrick Mahomes leading the offense.
Still, Kansas City received plenty of criticism over benefiting from the non-penalty call.
After the contest, Falcons head coach Raheem Morris didn’t want to comment on the topic.
Atlanta, meanwhile, will take on the division rival New Orleans Saints next Sunday.
Comments / 614
Add a Comment
democrat=pedo~exceptwalszheprefershorses
21d ago
“Look from my angle the bookies pay better than you bums so mind your business”
Tim Clark
21d ago
so they keep saying pass interference isn't reviewed . for what reason do they claim .it's obvious the only purpose of not allowing certain things that can drastically alter games not be reviewable.. really NFL .. and people lose their money in hopes of making a fortune only to make the commisioner generation money..if you haven't noticed how ridiculous these outcome of the under dogs winning week after week.. and while I do believe that any team can beat any team on any given Sunday but not at the ridiculous rate that it's happening just see who's the favorite see which way the money's going and the opposite's going to happen
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Local News
