Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
VTDigger
Judge dismisses senators’ lawsuit over education secretary’s interim appointment
By Ethan Weinstein,
13 hours ago
Updated at 4:53 p.m.
A judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit brought by two Vermont state senators over Gov. Phil Scott’s appointment of Zoie Saunders as interim education secretary.
The ruling came a day after Judge Robert Mello heard from both sides in Washington County superior court and signaled he would issue a speedy decision. Mello and the parties indicated Thursday the case could wind up appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court.
“To the extent that the Senators argue that the Senate’s decision to not confirm Ms. Saunders prevents the Governor from reappointing her, whether on an interim or permanent basis, the court disagrees,” Mello wrote in his 10-page order.
READ MORE
“When the legislature has wanted to so limit the Governor’s appointment power, it has simply said so,” he added, referencing legislation that prevents the governor from immediately reappointing someone to the Green Mountain Care Board after they’ve been rejected by the Senate.
An attorney representing the senators said Friday they have yet to decide if they will appeal the decision.
The lawmakers argued the governor cannot reappoint a secretary in an interim capacity after the Senate has already rejected that appointment in the same biennium. The executive branch argued the governor is well within his authority to do so, and that the lawmakers do not have standing to bring a case at all, calling the questions at hand “political.”
Mello ultimately ruled the senators did have standing to bring the case, but sided with the governor on the case’s merits.
“Ms. Saunders is not intended to be indefinite in some manner usurping the Senate’s advice and consent authority,” Mello said. Instead, Saunders is serving in the role until “a permanent secretary can be presented to the Senate again in the next legislative session,” he determined.
Saunders’ interim term lasts until the end of February 2025, and she can be reappointed on a permanent or interim basis.
The judge grounded his decision in the centuries-long history of Vermont politics, noting the governor’s state constitutional powers predate the existence of a Vermont Senate.
Mello determined that interim appointments are “of necessity” made without the Senate’s approval.
“It is unreasonable to expect that any governor, surprised by a secretarial vacancy, could instantly make such a weighty decision as to who to appoint as a successor without due diligence and contemplation,” the judge wrote.
While Mello acknowledged a governor could act in “bad faith” by repeatedly appointing someone in an interim capacity, he said there was “no evidence of that in this case.”
In an interview, John Franco, an attorney representing the senators, said he appreciated the depth of Mello’s written ruling.
“This was not something on the back of an envelope,” he said.
Still, Franco disagreed with the judge’s interpretation.
“If this is the case, then the advice and consent of the Senate is an illusion,” he said.
As for a possible appeal, Franco wouldn’t commit one way or the other.
“That decision will be made shortly,” he said, “but not today.”
A spokesperson for Gov. Scott did not respond to a request for comment Friday afternoon.
Disclosure: Jared Carter, an attorney for the senators, is providing pro bono legal assistance to VTDigger in an unrelated public records case.
Unfortunately, the teachers union has control over the Vt legislature. Pretty obvious they’re afraid of Zoie Saunders. Probably a good thing that Ms Saunders was never part of a public school system. Maybe she could bring some objective views to the schools in Vt. Vt property taxes went up 14% this year. Primarily driven by education costs. It’s time to start cutting positions and non essential programs, and transition the pension to a 401k. Too bad the liberals in Montpelier insist on the status quo. Vermonters can expect another 14% tax increase next year.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.