<body><div><img src="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?type=thumbnail_580x000&amp;url=4Zm2KN_0vmOFEzX00" alt="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=4Zm2KN_0vmOFEzX00" width="1200" height="630" >The Institute for Homeland Security at Sam Houston State University just published my paper – “Who’s in charge of OT security.”CISOs have traditionally been responsible for cyber security of enterprise IT networks excluding the control system (operational) assets which were under the purview of the engineering organizations. After the 2006 Gartner Research paper that coined the term “operational technology (OT)”, the CISOs have been given the additional responsibility for cyber securing OT assets without a firm understanding of the technical constraints of OT systems.Get your subscription to Control's tri-weekly newsletter.Unfortunately, that change frequently has resulted in OT systems being operationally impacted by employing network cyber security technologies and testing that worked for IT but not OT inadvertently impacting control system reliability. In many cases, CISOs or their organizations have excluded engineering organizations from participating in OT cyber security which has caused further organizational chasms between the engineering and network security organizations.Therefore, I posit that CISOs as advocates for enterprise security be engaged with the CISO. However, there also needs to be engineering advocates for the reliable, safe, and secure operation of the control systems. The paper and my presentations provide justification for those responsible for security and facility operations also be engaged in IT, OT and control systems discussions with the CISO and the C-Suite. Consequently, the purpose of the paper is to address the question of which team in the organization should oversee OT cyber security to maximize security effectiveness and minimize potential inadvertent operational impacts of OT systems.Separately, on Sept. 24, 2024, Paul Venneman from Blue Ridge Networks and I gave a presentation at HouSecCon on “OT cyber security: the cure is worse than the disease” because inappropriate network security technologies and testing have directly contributed to control system cyber-related incidents. I will have more to say about the HouSecCon session in another blog.</div></body>

Mountain View, CA

NewsBreak

Sam Houston State University paper: “Who’s in charge of OT security”

The Institute for Homeland Security at Sam Houston State University just published my paper – “Who’s in charge of OT security.”. CISOs have traditionally been responsible for cyber security of enterprise IT networks excluding the control system (operational) assets which were under the purview of the engineering organizations. After the 2006 Gartner Research paper that coined the term “operational technology (OT)”, the CISOs have been given the additional responsibility for cyber securing OT assets without a firm understanding of the technical constraints of OT systems.