Army, Navy and Marines Recent Rash of Senior Enlisted Leadership Firings
29 days ago
In military organizations, leadership is paramount. The effectiveness, morale, and cohesion of a unit often hinge on the ability, integrity, and decision-making of its leaders. When a military leader fails to meet the standards of their position, it can trigger a "loss of confidence" among their superiors or subordinates. This loss of confidence is a formal military term used to justify the removal of a leader from their position due to a perceived lack of trust or belief in their ability to effectively perform their duties. The reasons for such removals are varied and complex, but they generally revolve around failures in leadership, ethics, judgment, or competence.
The term "loss of confidence" in a military context refers to a decision made by superiors to remove an officer from their position of command or leadership. This action is usually taken when there is a belief that the officer is no longer capable of effectively leading their unit, maintaining good order and discipline, or fulfilling the responsibilities required of their position. The loss of confidence does not always imply criminal behavior or misconduct; rather, it reflects a broader concern about the leader’s overall performance, decision-making, integrity, or adherence to core military values.
This concept is significant because it underscores the importance of trust and confidence in military leadership. The hierarchical structure of the military relies heavily on both, and without them, the chain of command can become weakened or broken, potentially jeopardizing the safety, morale, and mission success of the unit.
The Army has fired a string of senior enlisted leaders in recent months, and at least one former command sergeant major faces a court-martial for domestic violence allegations.
Recent reliefs span Army commands around the globe, and do not appear to be connected.
Most recently, former Command Sgt. Maj. Jaime Rubio of 5th Squadron, 15th Cavalry Regiment, was arraigned Aug. 14 on two counts of domestic violence at Fort Moore, Georgia, according to the Army court docket.
That docket indicates Rubio has pleaded not guilty and a trial is scheduled for November. Rubio was relieved from his position on March 25, “due to a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership ability,” an Army spokesperson told Military Times.
Meanwhile, near the nation’s capital, Command Sgt. Maj. Harold “Ed” Jarrell, the senior enlisted leader for 1st Information Operations Command, was relieved of command on Aug. 13.
The Army has declined to explain why Jarrell and Knapp were let go, but statements from their respective units said there was a “loss of trust and confidence” in them.
Last month, Command Sgt. Maj. Matthew Carlson was relieved of his duties with the 173rd Airborne Brigade after an investigation that officials said “pertained to alcohol-related incidents.”
“The incidents that led to his relief were alcohol-related,” Lt. Col. Alex Tignor, an Army spokesperson, told Military Times.
Tignor added that “the substantiated conduct which led to the relief decision was non-criminal in nature.”
Citing privacy law, Tignor declined to comment on recent media reports that outlined other allegations against Carlson, which could not be independently verified by Military Times.
Because they refused to swear allegiance to the POTUS instead of the Constitution and We The People! We are being duped by these Communists in Charge! The Great American Divider Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Satoro of Indonesia is commanding with Dementia Joe as his front man for his 3rd term and if Scamala wins he will be directing his 4th term making his Marxist dictates from behind the Oval Office curtains! This is only the lastest move to control and weaponize the Armed Services against We The People!
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.