Filed on Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, the complaint alleges Hill preyed on Michel’s financial vulnerability to get him to sign a contract for the originally plotted 2023 tour in a “veiled and devious attempt to make a big score for herself.”
“In the process, it did not matter to Hill if she took full advantage of Michel’s vulnerability — her friend and creative partner of over 30 years,” the lawsuit reads. “In fact, she counted on exploiting that vulnerability to carry out her scheme.”
The suit claims that the tour should have been “a huge commercial success, since most of shows for the entire arena size tour were sold out in advance,” but was undermined by Hill’s tour budget with “unnecessary, and, most likely fictitious, expenses, that seemed to be designed to lose money.”
Michel’s attorneys allege Hill was secretly taking 40% of tour revenue before splitting the rest with him and Wyclef Jean. “We assert that Ms. Hill misrepresented critical financial information and concealed her intent to take an excessive 60 percent share of the tour’s proceeds, leaving Mr. Michel with only 20 percent instead of the group’s customary one-third split,” said attorney Robert Meloni in a statement to Rolling Stone .
As an example of Hill’s “arrogance,” Michel’s attorneys allege that she “unilaterally rejected” the purported $5 million Coachella offer because “her ego was bruised” at No Doubt “receiving top billing over The Fugees the night of their show.”
“Hill never told Michel about the offer or that she had rejected it,” his lawyers wrote. “The money the Fugees would have been paid for Coachella would have defrayed most of the additional legal retainer Michel needed. So much for Hill being the guardian angel for her bandmate, Michel. Massaging her own ego was more important.”
Elsewhere in the lawsuit, Michel claims that Hill told Live Nation that he was “on board” for the 2024 tour to secure a $1.1 million advance when that wasn’t the case. “That was another lie by Hill and [her company] since Michel was not ‘on board,'” it reads, with the further accusation that Hill’s company “never signed the fully-negotiated agreement, never paid Michel anything, and never intended to do either.”
Hill is also accused of being responsible for the low ticket sales rather than “clickbait headlines” she cited at the time: “Because of the gross mismanagement by Hill and [her company], who had taken far too long to close the deal with Live Nation, the 2024 U.S. tour tickets sales were dismal. There was little or no marketing for the tour, and not enough time between the announcement and the first concert date to do sufficient advance sales to justify the tour.”
For her part, Hill responded with a lengthy press statement saying the “baseless” lawsuit is “full of false claims and unwarranted attacks.” She claimed the tour was planned to celebrate the 25th anniversary of The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill “whether the Fugees were involved or not,” but brought in the group after hearing about Michel’s legal troubles.
According to Hill, she and Wyclef deferred their full advances to front Michel $3 million for his legal fees and “make sure he had what he needed and was able to go.” He is allegedly in breach of a repayment agreement for this advance.
Hill also explained how she “absorbed most of the expenses myself” since the Fugees set used the same production as her solo performance. “Pras basically just had to show up and perform,” she said.
Read the full statement below:
“Some clarity and facts need to be presented. I’ve been silent and pushing through because I understood that Pras was under duress because of his legal battles and that this was perhaps affecting his judgment, state of mind and character.
Fact #1: This baseless lawsuit by Pras is full of false claims and unwarranted attacks. It notably omits that he was advanced overpayment for the last tour and has failed to repay substantial loans extended by myself as an act of goodwill. Last year’s tour was put together to celebrate the 25th Anniversary of the album The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill. It was being planned whether the Fugees were involved or not.
Fact #2: The tour was expanded to incorporate the Fugees because I found out that Pras was in trouble and would need money to aid his legal defense.
Fact #3: Pras was given a $3M advance for the tour, which he said he required to pay his legal fees. Wyclef and Myself deferred our full advances to make sure he had what he needed and was able to go. I covered most of the tour expenses, as the majority of the tour advance had gone to Pras. An agreement was put in place to secure the repayment of the money he was advanced. Pras has not paid back the money he was advanced, and is currently in breach of this agreement.
Fact #4: Because my tour, band, production, and set up were already happening, the Fugees set utilized this same production. I absorbed most of the expenses myself, produced the show, put together the entire set (with Wyclef’s participation for the Fugees and Wyclef’s set). Pras basically just had to show up and perform.
Fact #5: As of the last tour Pras thanked me for ‘saving his life’. (I have the receipts.)
Fact #6: I am not in the business of kicking anyone, especially when they’re down, which is why I haven’t responded to date. It is absolutely disheartening to see Pras in this position, my band mate and someone I considered a friend but this leads us to Fact #7, which probably should have been Fact #1…
Fact #7: I was not in Pras’ life when he decided to make the unfortunate decision that lead to his current legal troubles. I did not advise that he make that decision and therefore am in no way responsible for his decision and its consequences though I have taken it upon myself to help. Despite his attacks, I am still compassionate and hope things work out for him.”
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.
Local News
Comments / 0