<body><div><img src="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?type=thumbnail_580x000&amp;url=3ok66O_0w1xgecE00" alt="https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3ok66O_0w1xgecE00" width="1024" height="681" >In a period featuring high-profile quarterback misfires, the Browns are firmly in that club — perhaps having committed the featured misstep. The Deshaun Watson trade/extension is producing so little it has undercut an otherwise well-built roster. While injuries are affecting Cleveland’s offense, Watson has done little throughout his tenure to indicate he will live up to the five-year, $230MM fully guaranteed deal that had swayed him to waive his no-trade clause for the Browns.[RELATED: Browns Not Expected To Trade Amari Cooper]Jimmy Haslam said two years ago Berry hatched the plan to give Watson the fully guaranteed deal to convince him to waive his no-trade clause for Cleveland. Watson had eliminated the Browns from consideration and was heading toward committing to the Falcons. The fully guaranteed deal brought him to Ohio, but the Browns have not reaped much from the trade. They entered the season still waiting for Watson’s Houston-era form to resurface. Five games in, calls for his benching have been loud enough Stefanski has been forced to deny he has considered it.Stefanski’s offense certainly worked better with Joe Flacco at the controls, while Jacoby Brissett was effective in stretches as well during Watson’s suspension. Baker Mayfield also bounced back from his rough 2019 season under Freddie Kitchens, leading the Browns to their first playoff berth in 18 years in 2020. Watson’s poor play points to Stefanski needing to consider using Jameis Winston, whom the Browns signed instead of offering Flacco a deal to return. But the fifth-year Browns HC confirmed ownership would be a part of any decision to bench Watson (or any notable football decision).Owners widely meddle in football matters, as is their right even when they obviously carry less insight compared to football ops personnel. However, this particular group having significant involvement in football matters is interesting due to its past. Prior to landing on the Berry-Stefanski tandem, the Haslams cycled through six head coaches (counting interim 2018 HC Gregg Williams) and five football ops bosses since buying the team in 2012.The Browns became the second team to finish 0-16, completing a 4-44 stretch from 2015-17. That span came after Jimmy Haslam pushed for Johnny Manziel in the 2014 first round. The current Browns situation formed when became the first team since 1976 to trade three first-round picks for a veteran quarterback, and the contract they authorized — despite Watson being embroiled in off-field turmoil at the time — threatens to sink the roster Berry has built.Watson ranks last in QBR among qualified passers this season, and his EPA per dropback is the worst of any Browns QB to start a season this century. Being sacked an NFL-high 26 times, Watson also sports the league’s third-worst rate of off-target throws (20.7%), Oyefusi adds. Watson, who averaged an NFL-high 8.9 yards per attempt in his final season as the Texans’ starter, is averaging a league-worst 4.8 per throw to start this season.The Browns have a macro crisis on their hands, with their attempt to tailor Stefanski’s offense to their high-priced passer’s talents — via the Ken Dorsey OC hire — not working. Stefanski is not giving up play-calling duties at this time, and the question of whether he has the authority to bench Watson is now worth asking. The Cardinals and Titans also showed how quickly HC and GM extensions can turn into firings. Ownership pushed out the Steve Keim–Kliff Kingsbury tandem less than a year after extending both. Titans GM Jon Robinson was gone months after a 2022 re-up, and Mike Vrabel — despite a Coach of the Year honor — was out less than two years after his payday.While this potentially puts Berry and Stefanski on notice, it is premature to suggest they are on hot seats. Though, this Watson catastrophe certainly could warrant a major firing.Thanks to Watson’s two restructures, he is on the Browns’ 2025 and ’26 cap sheets at $72.9MM. No player has ever counted more than $50MM on a team’s payroll, with Dallas’ 11th-hour Dak Prescott extension moving him south of that mark.Watson having settled his most recent civil suit alleging sexual assault also lessens the chances the Browns could void future guarantees in the event of a second suspension. Absent that, it would cost Cleveland $172.7MM (spread over two years, in a post-June 1 scenario) to cut Watson in 2025. For better or worse, the Browns are stuck here. Stefanski and Co. will continue to try making this foundation-shifting plan work.12 comments on “Kevin Stefanski Addresses Browns Ownership’s Role In Football Decisions” </div></body>

Mountain View, CA

NewsBreak

Kevin Stefanski Addresses Browns Ownership’s Role In Football Decisions

In a period featuring high-profile quarterback misfires, the Browns are firmly in that club — perhaps having committed the featured misstep. The Deshaun Watson trade/extension is producing so little it has undercut an otherwise well-built roster. While injuries are affecting Cleveland’s offense, Watson has done little throughout his tenure to indicate he will live up to the five-year, $230MM fully guaranteed deal that had swayed him to waive his no-trade clause for the Browns.

Kevin Stefanski Addresses Browns Ownership’s Role In Football Decisions

Comments / 0