More than 100 members of Congress call for US to ‘suspend’ controversial health study on alcohol
By Lisa Fickenscher,
6 hours ago
More than 100 members of Congress have called for the US government to “suspend” an influential study about the health risks of alcohol – as beer, wine and liquor makers raised concerns that a panel doing the research is staffed by anti-alcohol activists.
In a letter this week, US lawmakers including New York Reps. Nicole Malliotakis and Mike Lawler seized on the fact that the study is being conducted by a group called the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking — or ICCPUD.
Alcohol executives fear that the study could include tough recommendations against alcohol use as it advises on the US government’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which are due for a regular five-year update in 2025.
“There would be a ripple effect if the guidelines change and consumers could reduce their consumption of alcohol,” Michael Kaiser, executive director of trade group WineAmerica , told The Post. “People will buy fewer bottles for consumption at home and might wait until they go out on the weekend.”
Health and Human Services hasn’t publicly commented on its decision to hire ICCPUD for the study, and didn’t respond to The Post’s requests for comment.
“HHS has offered no explanation and that’s the heart of the problem,” Kaiser said. “All signs point to the anti-alcohol movement.”
The lawmakers – many of them from beer-, wine- and liquor-producing states including California, Washington and Kentucky – ripped “the secretive process at ICCPUD” and claimed the group’s researchers “were not appropriately vetted for conflicts of interest,” according to the Monday letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and USDA Secretary Thomas Vilsack.
Among the researchers is Dr. Tim Naimi, who has previously recommended that adult males consume no more than one drink a day — down from the two drinks a day that have been recommended since 1980 by the US government’s Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The DGA recommends one drink per day for women.
Others on the six-member DGA panel include Jürgen Rehm, senior scientist at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health; and Kevin Shield, a scientist who runs a World Health Organization center on addiction.
Last year, a WHO report concluded that “no level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health” — the first such dire warning from the influential global nonprofit.
Among the letter’s signatories is Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), who subpoenaed documents from the USDA on Sept. 30 demanding more transparency from the agency on how ICCPUD’s findings were gathered and will be used to set new dietary guidelines.
A week later, 110 members of Congress asked both the USDA and HHS to scrap ICCPUD’s study entirely, noting that another group – the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, or NASEM – has long handled research on alcohol consumption and also has been conducting a study that Congress had authorized.
They also griped that “interested stakeholders have had limited opportunities to comment and track all but one public meeting held in early August.”
Not all of the scientific community is lining up against alcohol.
“It’s tempting to assume that because heavy alcohol consumption is very bad, lesser amounts must be at least a little bad. But the science isn’t there,” according to a Harvard Public Health editorial in August.
In the 1980s and 1990s the wine industry – especially red wine – benefitted from research showing that drinking vino was healthy, “now the pendulum has swung so far in the opposite direction that contemporary narratives suggest every ounce of alcohol is dangerous,” according to the editorial.
“Now, we’re told you can die from drinking a glass at lunch,” wine importer Michael Yurch complained in an interview with The Post. “Why all of a sudden is it so bad for you?”
Wine consumption worldwide declined by 4% last year to a 27-year low as consumers were stung by higher prices due to inflation and as wine lost market share to spirits, industry experts say.
Consumption of spirits in the U.S. was down 3% and beer down 3.5% for the first seven months of 2024, according to IWSR, a global drinks data and analytics firm.
yeah and alcohol kills more people a year than real heroin did back when it was real heroin yet these same congressmen had no problem ruining millions of people lives to the point that fetanyl is now the only option. These same people caused the opioid epidemic. You let these giant pharma companies get tens of millions of Americans hooked on opioids then cut them off with little to no warning and then throw them in jail, treat them like complete garbage and ruin their lives for trying to keep themselves from being violently ill from the medicines you gave them. Now a whole generation is lost because of these people. The drug war was lost a long time ago, just like prohibition.
Edna Thompson
49m ago
All you people of the world load yourselves up with as much alcohol, beer, drugs, cigarette, marijuana, cocaine, meth products, marijuana, muscle relaxers, narcotics, and everything else that gets you a high, make you feel good, commit disgusting and lewd acts and whatever other down dirty slimy engagement that suits your fancy. Listen to no one who suggest a lifestyle change and a new occupation because they don't know what they are talking about and science is just another conspiracy theory. Only those in severe and dire pain because of some injury or other debilitating problem require certain drugs but require regulation because for those drugs are killers; however, for the rest of you that just use for a hobby or so called recreational use, just keep doing what pleases your pea sized brain , and listen to no one looking out for your best interest because you don't have to; but, remember there is a price to pay for failing to listen, learn and do for your own wellbeing.
Get updates delivered to you daily. Free and customizable.
It’s essential to note our commitment to transparency:
Our Terms of Use acknowledge that our services may not always be error-free, and our Community Standards emphasize our discretion in enforcing policies. As a platform hosting over 100,000 pieces of content published daily, we cannot pre-vet content, but we strive to foster a dynamic environment for free expression and robust discourse through safety guardrails of human and AI moderation.