Open in App
  • Local
  • Headlines
  • Election
  • Crime Map
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Education
  • Real Estate
  • Newsletter
  • iHeartRadio

    Surprise Decision Made On Man Convicted Of Killing Michael Jordan's Dad

    By Jason Hall,

    10 hours ago
    https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3hAyRl_0wAbbyBx00
    Photo: Getty Images

    The judge who presided over the 1996 trial centered around the death of James Jordan , the father of Basketball Hall of Famer Michael Jordan , petitioned the North Carolina parole commission to release the man he sentenced to life in prison on Tuesday (October 15), ABC News reports.

    Retired Judge Gregory Weeks noted that a forensic blood analyst who investigated the case against Daniel Green , 49, questioned whether the blood-like substance found in Jordan's car was actually blood. Prosecutors argued that Jordan was sleeping in the passenger seat of his Lexus parked along Highway 74 when he was fatally shot by Green during the 1996 trial, which supported the testimony of the main witness, co-defendant Larry Demery , who accused Green of firing the weapon.

    The analyst, however, never disclosed whether forensic tests on findings from the vehicle concluded if actual blood was found. Weeks told the commission that he was haunted by the crucial detail that could've changed the outcome of the trial for nearly three decades in his plea for Green to be released, according to several criminal justice advocates who were at the North Carolina parole commission proceeding.

    Green, who is serving a life sentence at Southern Correctional Institution in North Carolina, acknowledged that the judge who "presided over my trial asked that I be paroled is significant" while speaking to ABC News in a phone interview from prison.

    “It speaks volumes about this case, and I’m overwhelmingly grateful," he added.

    Comments / 15
    Add a Comment
    I Said What I Said
    2m ago
    Watch Tarnished Badge on YouTube & you'll understand how corrupt law enforcement determined this case, not evidence. Green definitely needs his case heard again.
    BLACK BY POPULAR DEMAND
    1h ago
    🤷🏽‍♂️”Actually, and required by law ⚖️🗽, that if a defendant was found guilty based on evidence that was later found to be insufficient or inconclusive evidence, the defendant can either get his case dismissed or be exonerated. Seems like this case shows 👀 that his co-defendant lied 🤥 on this Green guy that Green did the shooting, but their was no weapon found on Green nor any blood 🩸, which the prosecutor said it was and used to convict Green. Dismiss this case or, exonerate him, or give him that parole, legally period. RIGHT ON✊🏽.”
    View all comments
    YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
    Local News newsLocal News

    Comments / 0